2018 XCSP3 competition: parallel solvers tracks: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
Fapp/Fapp-m2s/
Fapp-m2s-07-0600_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameFapp/Fapp-m2s/
Fapp-m2s-07-0600_c18.xml
MD5SUM0ae5362fc8ec35126a2a174beba608b8
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmark
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables13855
Number of constraints8996
Number of domains202
Minimum domain size1
Maximum domain size151
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":1,"count":2},{"size":2,"count":4816},{"size":11,"count":4218},{"size":12,"count":1},{"size":21,"count":9},{"size":23,"count":10},{"size":25,"count":44},{"size":29,"count":37},{"size":31,"count":2},{"size":32,"count":3},{"size":33,"count":37},{"size":34,"count":12},{"size":35,"count":9},{"size":36,"count":11},{"size":37,"count":13},{"size":38,"count":8},{"size":39,"count":37},{"size":40,"count":13},{"size":41,"count":28},{"size":42,"count":21},{"size":43,"count":32},{"size":44,"count":30},{"size":45,"count":18},{"size":46,"count":11},{"size":48,"count":13},"...",{"size":119,"count":4}, {"size":120,"count":3}, {"size":121,"count":17}, {"size":123,"count":97}, {"size":125,"count":18}, {"size":126,"count":17}, {"size":127,"count":42}, {"size":128,"count":76}, {"size":130,"count":61}, {"size":131,"count":88}, {"size":132,"count":46}, {"size":133,"count":30}, {"size":135,"count":53}, {"size":136,"count":94}, {"size":137,"count":43}, {"size":138,"count":8}, {"size":139,"count":29}, {"size":141,"count":5}, {"size":143,"count":122}, {"size":144,"count":136}, {"size":145,"count":57}, {"size":147,"count":60}, {"size":148,"count":54}, {"size":150,"count":21}, {"size":151,"count":1165}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree4219
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":12654},{"degree":3,"count":1},{"degree":4,"count":10},{"degree":5,"count":17},{"degree":6,"count":18},{"degree":7,"count":18},{"degree":8,"count":40},{"degree":9,"count":42},{"degree":10,"count":76},{"degree":11,"count":64},{"degree":12,"count":63},{"degree":13,"count":48},{"degree":14,"count":63},{"degree":15,"count":70},{"degree":16,"count":93},{"degree":17,"count":127},{"degree":18,"count":153},{"degree":19,"count":186},{"degree":20,"count":110},{"degree":21,"count":1},{"degree":4219,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity6
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":560},{"arity":3,"count":4218},{"arity":6,"count":4218}]
Number of extensional constraints4218
Number of intensional constraints4778
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"extension","count":4218},{"type":"intension","count":4778}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin SUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
OscaR - Parallel with EPS 2018-08-14 (complete)4309293SAT (TO)2054659793 19508.3 2520.41
OscaR - Parallel with EPS 2018-07-02 (complete)4292000SAT (TO)2055081639 19487.3 2521.11
Choco-solver 4.0.7b par (e747e1e) (complete)4297937? 5077.1 881.344

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 2054659793
Solution found:
--too large--