2018 XCSP3 competition: parallel solvers tracks: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
StripPacking/
StripPacking-1b_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameStripPacking/
StripPacking-1b_c18.xml
MD5SUM1d962658b6cfa8354278e550b215e9b2
Bench CategoryCSP (decision problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark3.31696
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables50
Number of constraints31
Number of domains12
Minimum domain size1
Maximum domain size15
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":1,"count":2},{"size":2,"count":28},{"size":15,"count":20}]
Minimum variable degree1
Maximum variable degree3
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":1,"count":10},{"degree":2,"count":20},{"degree":3,"count":20}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity40
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":20},{"arity":3,"count":10},{"arity":40,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints10
Number of intensional constraints20
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"extension","count":10},{"type":"intension","count":20},{"type":"noOverlap","count":1}]
Optimization problemNO
Type of objective

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
scop order+glucose-syrup (2018-07-07) (complete)4297013SAT 3.31696 1.68532
scop both+glucose-syrup (2018-07-07) (complete)4297249SAT 3.37769 1.69208
scop order+glucose-syrup (2018-07-31) (complete)4307197SAT 4.70034 2.57078
scop both+glucose-syrup (2018-07-31) (complete)4307433SAT 4.71106 2.56383
Choco-solver 4.0.7b par (e747e1e) (complete)4297748SAT 4.91503 1.22477
OscaR - Parallel with EPS 2018-07-02 (complete)4291335SAT 1819.86 231.131
OscaR - Parallel with EPS 2018-08-14 (complete)4309104SAT 1900.53 241.59

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function:
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list>x[0] x[1] x[2] x[3] x[4] x[5] x[6] x[7] x[8] x[9] y[0] y[1] y[2] y[3] y[4] y[5] y[6] y[7] y[8] y[9] w[0] w[1] w[2]
w[3] w[4] w[5] w[6] w[7] w[8] w[9] h[0] h[1] h[2] h[3] h[4] h[5] h[6] h[7] h[8] h[9] r[0] r[1] r[2] r[3] r[4] r[5] r[6] r[7] r[8]
r[9]</list> <values>3 9 9 2 12 0 7 0 0 3 0 0 3 10 3 0 8 9 7 8 6 6 3 5 3 3 5 2 3 4 8 3 5 5 12 7 7 6 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0</values>
</instantiation>