2018 XCSP3 competition: mini-solvers track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
TravellingSalesman/
TravellingSalesman-25-30-00_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameTravellingSalesman/
TravellingSalesman-25-30-00_c18.xml
MD5SUMfffb7bc75ae44a730e23d85d48ed452e
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark113
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark303.201
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables50
Number of constraints26
Number of domains2
Minimum domain size25
Maximum domain size32
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":25,"count":25},{"size":32,"count":25}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree3
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":25},{"degree":3,"count":25}]
Minimum constraint arity3
Maximum constraint arity25
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":3,"count":25},{"arity":25,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints25
Number of intensional constraints0
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"extension","count":25},{"type":"allDifferent","count":1}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin SUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
SuperSolver_Macq_Stevenart 2018-04-27 (incomplete)4300410SAT113 303.201 300.367
MiniCPFever 2018-04-29 (complete)4300407SAT (TO)115 2520.08 2488.82
The dodo solver 2018-04-29 (complete)4300411SAT (TO)115 2520.12 2516.02
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4300405SAT (TO)118 2519.89 2520.01
GG's minicp 2018-04-29 (complete)4300406SAT (TO)124 2520.04 2504.52
Solver of Xavier Schul & Yvhan Smal 2018-04-28 (incomplete)4300409SAT (TO)133 2520.08 2478.23
slowpoke 2018-04-29 (incomplete)4300408SAT (TO)138 2520.07 2511.03

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 113
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list> c[0] c[1] c[2] c[3] c[4] c[5] c[6] c[7] c[8] c[9] c[10] c[11] c[12] c[13] c[14] c[15] c[16] c[17] c[18] c[19] c[20]
c[21] c[22] c[23] c[24] d[0] d[1] d[2] d[3] d[4] d[5] d[6] d[7] d[8] d[9] d[10] d[11] d[12] d[13] d[14] d[15] d[16] d[17] d[18] d[19] d[20]
d[21] d[22] d[23] d[24] </list> <values> 5 1 0 2 3 4 6 7 8 11 14 12 9 13 15 16 22 24 23 21 20 18 19 17 10 4 7 2 1 2 4 5 1 8 4 4 4 6 5 5 8 12
3 2 4 3 2 1 8 8 </values> </instantiation>