2018 XCSP3 competition: mini-solvers track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
SteelMillSlab_Mini/
SteelMillSlab-m2s-mini-simple_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameSteelMillSlab_Mini/
SteelMillSlab-m2s-mini-simple_c18.xml
MD5SUM4c99765df098abb1ee0e5ddce9c6b7bf
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark0
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.015892
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables160
Number of constraints230
Number of domains4
Minimum domain size2
Maximum domain size19
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":2,"count":130},{"size":5,"count":10},{"size":10,"count":10},{"size":19,"count":10}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree20
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":120},{"degree":3,"count":10},{"degree":4,"count":10},{"degree":6,"count":10},{"degree":20,"count":10}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity11
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":210},{"arity":3,"count":10},{"arity":11,"count":10}]
Number of extensional constraints210
Number of intensional constraints0
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"extension","count":210},{"type":"sum","count":20}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin SUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4300221OPT0 0.015892 0.0169279
Solver of Xavier Schul & Yvhan Smal 2018-04-28 (incomplete)4300225OPT0 0.851344 0.438632
SuperSolver_Macq_Stevenart 2018-04-27 (incomplete)4300226SAT0 304.916 300.395
slowpoke 2018-04-29 (incomplete)4300224SAT (TO)0 2520.08 2508.03
MiniCPFever 2018-04-29 (complete)4300223SAT (TO)0 2520.09 2483.32
GG's minicp 2018-04-29 (complete)4300222SAT (TO)0 2520.09 2501.72
The dodo solver 2018-04-29 (complete)4300227SAT (TO)0 2520.09 2508.13

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 0
Solution found:
<instantiation type='solution' cost='0'> <list>load[0] load[1] load[2] load[3] load[4] load[5] load[6] load[7] load[8] load[9] loss[0]
loss[1] loss[2] loss[3] loss[4] loss[5] loss[6] loss[7] loss[8] loss[9] slab[0] slab[1] slab[2] slab[3] slab[4] slab[5] slab[6] slab[7]
slab[8] slab[9] y[0][0] y[0][1] y[0][2] y[0][3] y[0][4] y[0][5] y[0][6] y[0][7] y[0][8] y[0][9] y[1][0] y[1][1] y[1][2] y[1][3] y[1][4]
y[1][5] y[1][6] y[1][7] y[1][8] y[1][9] y[2][0] y[2][1] y[2][2] y[2][3] y[2][4] y[2][5] y[2][6] y[2][7] y[2][8] y[2][9] y[3][0] y[3][1]
y[3][2] y[3][3] y[3][4] y[3][5] y[3][6] y[3][7] y[3][8] y[3][9] y[4][0] y[4][1] y[4][2] y[4][3] y[4][4] y[4][5] y[4][6] y[4][7] y[4][8]
y[4][9] y[5][0] y[5][1] y[5][2] y[5][3] y[5][4] y[5][5] y[5][6] y[5][7] y[5][8] y[5][9] y[6][0] y[6][1] y[6][2] y[6][3] y[6][4] y[6][5]
y[6][6] y[6][7] y[6][8] y[6][9] y[7][0] y[7][1] y[7][2] y[7][3] y[7][4] y[7][5] y[7][6] y[7][7] y[7][8] y[7][9] y[8][0] y[8][1] y[8][2]
y[8][3] y[8][4] y[8][5] y[8][6] y[8][7] y[8][8] y[8][9] y[9][0] y[9][1] y[9][2] y[9][3] y[9][4] y[9][5] y[9][6] y[9][7] y[9][8] y[9][9]
z[0][0] z[0][1] z[0][2] z[1][0] z[1][1] z[1][2] z[2][0] z[2][1] z[2][2] z[3][0] z[3][1] z[3][2] z[4][0] z[4][1] z[4][2] z[5][0] z[5][1]
z[5][2] z[6][0] z[6][1] z[6][2] z[7][0] z[7][1] z[7][2] z[8][0] z[8][1] z[8][2] z[9][0] z[9][1] z[9][2] </list> <values>0 0 5 9 0 0 5 11 18
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 6 8 8 7 2 6 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 </values> </instantiation>