2018 XCSP3 competition: mini-solvers track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
GolombRuler/
GolombRuler-a3v18-09_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameGolombRuler/
GolombRuler-a3v18-09_c18.xml
MD5SUM967738086e80168f9eb4b0337d9e8cf6
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark44
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.82438
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables90
Number of constraints37
Number of domains2
Minimum domain size81
Maximum domain size82
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":81,"count":36},{"size":82,"count":9}]
Minimum variable degree0
Maximum variable degree9
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":0,"count":45},{"degree":2,"count":36},{"degree":8,"count":8},{"degree":9,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity3
Maximum constraint arity36
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":3,"count":36},{"arity":36,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints36
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":36},{"type":"allDifferent","count":1}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin VAR

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4299430OPT44 1.82438 1.82645
Solver of Xavier Schul & Yvhan Smal 2018-04-28 (incomplete)4299434OPT44 45.7536 44.3029
SuperSolver_Macq_Stevenart 2018-04-27 (incomplete)4299435SAT44 302.621 300.365
slowpoke 2018-04-29 (incomplete)4299433SAT (TO)44 2520.03 2510.52
The dodo solver 2018-04-29 (complete)4299436SAT (TO)44 2520.03 2515.51
GG's minicp 2018-04-29 (complete)4299431SAT (TO)56 2520.09 2507.31
MiniCPFever 2018-04-29 (complete)4299432Wrong UNSAT 25.7962 23.7893

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 44
Solution found:
<instantiation type='solution' cost='44'> <list>x[0] x[1] x[2] x[3] x[4] x[5] x[6] x[7] x[8] y[0][0] y[0][1] y[0][2] y[0][3] y[0][4] y[0][5]
y[0][6] y[0][7] y[0][8] y[1][0] y[1][1] y[1][2] y[1][3] y[1][4] y[1][5] y[1][6] y[1][7] y[1][8] y[2][0] y[2][1] y[2][2] y[2][3] y[2][4]
y[2][5] y[2][6] y[2][7] y[2][8] y[3][0] y[3][1] y[3][2] y[3][3] y[3][4] y[3][5] y[3][6] y[3][7] y[3][8] y[4][0] y[4][1] y[4][2] y[4][3]
y[4][4] y[4][5] y[4][6] y[4][7] y[4][8] y[5][0] y[5][1] y[5][2] y[5][3] y[5][4] y[5][5] y[5][6] y[5][7] y[5][8] y[6][0] y[6][1] y[6][2]
y[6][3] y[6][4] y[6][5] y[6][6] y[6][7] y[6][8] y[7][0] y[7][1] y[7][2] y[7][3] y[7][4] y[7][5] y[7][6] y[7][7] y[7][8] y[8][0] y[8][1]
y[8][2] y[8][3] y[8][4] y[8][5] y[8][6] y[8][7] y[8][8] </list> <values>0 1 5 12 25 27 35 41 44 * 1 5 12 25 27 35 41 44 * * 4 11 24 26 34 40
43 * * * 7 20 22 30 36 39 * * * * 13 15 23 29 32 * * * * * 2 10 16 19 * * * * * * 8 14 17 * * * * * * * 6 9 * * * * * * * * 3 * * * * * * *
* * </values> </instantiation>