2018 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
TravellingSalesman/
TravellingSalesman-10-20-00_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameTravellingSalesman/
TravellingSalesman-10-20-00_c18.xml
MD5SUM41acc49479871df381e8fa6a150e4ace
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark47
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.92642
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables20
Number of constraints11
Number of domains2
Minimum domain size10
Maximum domain size19
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":10,"count":10},{"size":19,"count":10}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree3
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":10},{"degree":3,"count":10}]
Minimum constraint arity3
Maximum constraint arity10
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":3,"count":10},{"arity":10,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints10
Number of intensional constraints0
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"extension","count":10},{"type":"allDifferent","count":1}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin SUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4312739OPT47 0.620409 0.620994
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4302121OPT47 1.92642 1.92788
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4312173OPT47 3.23938 1.69285
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-08-14 (complete)4310313OPT47 3.31921 1.74973
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4302119OPT47 6.5575 3.33086
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4302337OPT47 12.6567 6.28063
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4302687OPT47 13.0852 6.33199
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4302120SAT (TO)47 252.082 249.025
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4309963SAT (TO)47 252.11 247.22

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 47
Solution found:
<instantiation type="optimum" cost="47"> <list> c[0] c[1] c[2] c[3] c[4] c[5] c[6] c[7] c[8] c[9] d[0] d[1] d[2] d[3] d[4] d[5] d[6] d[7]
d[8] d[9] </list> <values> 0 1 5 4 9 7 6 8 2 3 3 2 2 5 4 6 7 3 2 13 </values> </instantiation>