2018 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
TravellingSalesman/
TravellingSalesman-75-50-00_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameTravellingSalesman/
TravellingSalesman-75-50-00_c18.xml
MD5SUM7fcf74bccc1d4f399a3457b4fd80f100
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark357
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark252.005
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables150
Number of constraints76
Number of domains2
Minimum domain size59
Maximum domain size75
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":59,"count":75},{"size":75,"count":75}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree3
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":75},{"degree":3,"count":75}]
Minimum constraint arity3
Maximum constraint arity75
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":3,"count":75},{"arity":75,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints75
Number of intensional constraints0
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"extension","count":75},{"type":"allDifferent","count":1}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin SUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4302115SAT (TO)357 252.005 252.01
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4302113SAT (TO)408 252.103 246.613
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-08-14 (complete)4310323SAT (TO)440 252.078 243.029
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4302347SAT (TO)626 252.08 237.74
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4302697SAT (TO)647 252.053 235.044
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4312737SAT (TO)731 251.979 252.01
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4312183SAT1011 251.504 247.366
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4309973SAT1237 251.665 247.367
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4302114? (TO) 260.179 100.945

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 357
Solution found:
<instantiation type='solution' cost='357'> <list>c[0] c[10] c[11] c[12] c[13] c[14] c[15] c[16] c[17] c[18] c[19] c[1] c[20] c[21] c[22]
c[23] c[24] c[25] c[26] c[27] c[28] c[29] c[2] c[30] c[31] c[32] c[33] c[34] c[35] c[36] c[37] c[38] c[39] c[3] c[40] c[41] c[42] c[43]
c[44] c[45] c[46] c[47] c[48] c[49] c[4] c[50] c[51] c[52] c[53] c[54] c[55] c[56] c[57] c[58] c[59] c[5] c[60] c[61] c[62] c[63] c[64]
c[65] c[66] c[67] c[68] c[69] c[6] c[70] c[71] c[72] c[73] c[74] c[7] c[8] c[9] d[0] d[10] d[11] d[12] d[13] d[14] d[15] d[16] d[17] d[18]
d[19] d[1] d[20] d[21] d[22] d[23] d[24] d[25] d[26] d[27] d[28] d[29] d[2] d[30] d[31] d[32] d[33] d[34] d[35] d[36] d[37] d[38] d[39] d[3]
d[40] d[41] d[42] d[43] d[44] d[45] d[46] d[47] d[48] d[49] d[4] d[50] d[51] d[52] d[53] d[54] d[55] d[56] d[57] d[58] d[59] d[5] d[60]
d[61] d[62] d[63] d[64] d[65] d[66] d[67] d[68] d[69] d[6] d[70] d[71] d[72] d[73] d[74] d[7] d[8] d[9] </list> <values>62 74 69 64 56 55 54
50 51 52 46 66 42 32 36 35 30 25 15 18 19 16 67 14 9 7 5 13 12 11 21 26 28 68 29 31 34 38 41 40 43 39 37 33 63 24 27 23 22 20 17 10 8 4 3 60
2 6 0 1 59 72 44 49 48 45 61 53 47 58 57 65 70 71 73 2 6 4 7 1 1 2 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 2 3 4 12 5 4 3 5 5 1 2 6 4 2 7 7 4 4 1 3 3 7 1 2 1 9 2 2 1
6 3 5 7 1 2 4 8 7 3 2 1 2 4 8 7 38 11 25 4 1 2 6 6 4 5 5 4 1 3 6 8 </values> </instantiation>