2018 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
TravellingSalesman/
TravellingSalesman-100-50-00_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameTravellingSalesman/
TravellingSalesman-100-50-00_c18.xml
MD5SUMac62098c303420005332b673e951092f
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark451
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark252.003
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables200
Number of constraints101
Number of domains2
Minimum domain size62
Maximum domain size100
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":62,"count":100},{"size":100,"count":100}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree3
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":100},{"degree":3,"count":100}]
Minimum constraint arity3
Maximum constraint arity100
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":3,"count":100},{"arity":100,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints100
Number of intensional constraints0
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"extension","count":100},{"type":"allDifferent","count":1}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin SUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4302109SAT (TO)451 252.003 252.01
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4302107SAT (TO)484 252.03 246.313
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-08-14 (complete)4310312SAT (TO)563 252.115 243.439
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4312735SAT (TO)746 251.944 252.011
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4302686SAT (TO)790 252.062 235.154
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4302336SAT (TO)858 252.067 239.235
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4312172SAT1434 251.89 247.38
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4309962SAT1595 251.879 247.383
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4302108? (TO) 260.223 104.182

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 451
Solution found:
<instantiation type='solution' cost='451'> <list>c[0] c[10] c[11] c[12] c[13] c[14] c[15] c[16] c[17] c[18] c[19] c[1] c[20] c[21] c[22]
c[23] c[24] c[25] c[26] c[27] c[28] c[29] c[2] c[30] c[31] c[32] c[33] c[34] c[35] c[36] c[37] c[38] c[39] c[3] c[40] c[41] c[42] c[43]
c[44] c[45] c[46] c[47] c[48] c[49] c[4] c[50] c[51] c[52] c[53] c[54] c[55] c[56] c[57] c[58] c[59] c[5] c[60] c[61] c[62] c[63] c[64]
c[65] c[66] c[67] c[68] c[69] c[6] c[70] c[71] c[72] c[73] c[74] c[75] c[76] c[77] c[78] c[79] c[7] c[80] c[81] c[82] c[83] c[84] c[85]
c[86] c[87] c[88] c[89] c[8] c[90] c[91] c[92] c[93] c[94] c[95] c[96] c[97] c[98] c[99] c[9] d[0] d[10] d[11] d[12] d[13] d[14] d[15] d[16]
d[17] d[18] d[19] d[1] d[20] d[21] d[22] d[23] d[24] d[25] d[26] d[27] d[28] d[29] d[2] d[30] d[31] d[32] d[33] d[34] d[35] d[36] d[37]
d[38] d[39] d[3] d[40] d[41] d[42] d[43] d[44] d[45] d[46] d[47] d[48] d[49] d[4] d[50] d[51] d[52] d[53] d[54] d[55] d[56] d[57] d[58]
d[59] d[5] d[60] d[61] d[62] d[63] d[64] d[65] d[66] d[67] d[68] d[69] d[6] d[70] d[71] d[72] d[73] d[74] d[75] d[76] d[77] d[78] d[79] d[7]
d[80] d[81] d[82] d[83] d[84] d[85] d[86] d[87] d[88] d[89] d[8] d[90] d[91] d[92] d[93] d[94] d[95] d[96] d[97] d[98] d[99] d[9] </list>
<values>14 0 18 19 23 94 93 98 83 75 77 11 85 84 80 92 95 97 86 76 74 55 15 56 61 68 69 79 78 81 87 89 90 6 91 96 99 88 82 70 24 26 21 25 10
32 39 44 45 41 52 58 60 67 66 16 73 72 71 65 57 64 63 62 59 54 20 38 28 33 36 37 40 48 43 47 51 17 50 53 49 46 42 31 35 34 30 29 12 27 22 13
1 2 7 3 4 5 9 8 4 8 2 3 48 1 4 9 6 2 4 3 3 2 5 2 1 6 5 7 7 4 4 2 4 1 7 2 3 3 4 4 3 2 6 8 6 4 6 23 11 5 3 5 2 4 3 2 3 4 4 1 3 3 3 4 1 1 2 7 3
5 1 2 3 7 3 7 4 4 1 3 2 6 1 2 1 1 9 2 2 1 6 5 1 6 1 2 2 4 8 11 7 4 4 1 2 3 7 8 </values> </instantiation>