2018 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
Rcpsp/
Rcpsp-j60-01-04_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameRcpsp/
Rcpsp-j60-01-04_c18.xml
MD5SUM9fb24b9f48a42a135634ba64a3eecbb5
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark91
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark2.84781
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables62
Number of constraints97
Number of domains2
Minimum domain size1
Maximum domain size324
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":1,"count":1},{"size":324,"count":61}]
Minimum variable degree3
Maximum variable degree5
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":3,"count":22},{"degree":4,"count":19},{"degree":5,"count":21}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity17
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":93},{"arity":12,"count":1},{"arity":15,"count":1},{"arity":16,"count":1},{"arity":17,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints93
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":93},{"type":"cumulative","count":4}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin VAR

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4312678OPT91 0.644371 0.710682
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4312208OPT91 2.84781 1.49312
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-08-14 (complete)4310348OPT91 3.44105 1.66273
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4301936OPT91 3.78364 1.47662
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4302722OPT91 9.03158 4.26725
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4302372OPT91 9.99485 4.45421
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4309998SAT (TO)91 252.035 247.142
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4301937SAT (TO)322 252.172 174.558
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4301938? (NS) 0.040822 0.041809

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 91
Solution found:
<instantiation type="optimum" cost="91"> <list> s[0] s[1] s[2] s[3] s[4] s[5] s[6] s[7] s[8] s[9] s[10] s[11] s[12] s[13] s[14] s[15] s[16]
s[17] s[18] s[19] s[20] s[21] s[22] s[23] s[24] s[25] s[26] s[27] s[28] s[29] s[30] s[31] s[32] s[33] s[34] s[35] s[36] s[37] s[38] s[39]
s[40] s[41] s[42] s[43] s[44] s[45] s[46] s[47] s[48] s[49] s[50] s[51] s[52] s[53] s[54] s[55] s[56] s[57] s[58] s[59] s[60] s[61] </list>
<values> 0 0 0 0 7 14 7 7 7 3 16 14 7 7 12 22 21 12 21 17 11 17 33 31 20 12 41 21 16 20 52 22 18 29 30 21 34 30 27 32 66 26 27 37 31 47 52
68 29 52 73 40 59 40 30 66 72 46 59 82 77 91 </values> </instantiation>