2018 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
Rcpsp/
Rcpsp-j60-01-02_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameRcpsp/
Rcpsp-j60-01-02_c18.xml
MD5SUM2a7801ec96cf67d89ec484abe9bad078
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark68
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark3.33733
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables62
Number of constraints97
Number of domains2
Minimum domain size1
Maximum domain size344
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":1,"count":1},{"size":344,"count":61}]
Minimum variable degree3
Maximum variable degree6
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":3,"count":24},{"degree":4,"count":16},{"degree":5,"count":21},{"degree":6,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity21
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":93},{"arity":11,"count":1},{"arity":12,"count":1},{"arity":16,"count":1},{"arity":21,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints93
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":93},{"type":"cumulative","count":4}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin VAR

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4312677OPT68 0.769296 0.77105
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4312206OPT68 3.33733 1.6469
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-08-14 (complete)4310346OPT68 3.82441 1.78924
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4301933OPT68 3.82809 1.48157
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4302720OPT68 9.41261 4.39388
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4302370OPT68 9.69653 4.52229
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4309996SAT (TO)68 252.096 246.63
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4301934SAT (TO)343 252.153 178.558
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4301935? (NS) 0.040885 0.0419401

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 68
Solution found:
<instantiation type="optimum" cost="68"> <list> s[0] s[1] s[2] s[3] s[4] s[5] s[6] s[7] s[8] s[9] s[10] s[11] s[12] s[13] s[14] s[15] s[16]
s[17] s[18] s[19] s[20] s[21] s[22] s[23] s[24] s[25] s[26] s[27] s[28] s[29] s[30] s[31] s[32] s[33] s[34] s[35] s[36] s[37] s[38] s[39]
s[40] s[41] s[42] s[43] s[44] s[45] s[46] s[47] s[48] s[49] s[50] s[51] s[52] s[53] s[54] s[55] s[56] s[57] s[58] s[59] s[60] s[61] </list>
<values> 0 28 0 0 7 7 37 16 21 24 14 18 14 21 22 22 33 22 24 29 24 24 16 33 28 30 33 16 37 33 51 36 35 28 37 33 37 43 38 45 45 44 36 45 59
37 42 26 44 48 48 54 49 56 59 39 63 58 59 61 66 68 </values> </instantiation>