2018 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
Rcpsp/
Rcpsp-j90-01-03_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameRcpsp/
Rcpsp-j90-01-03_c18.xml
MD5SUMecfa46aa6dcbda2e31280fbe487bc54f
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark66
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark5.36302
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables92
Number of constraints142
Number of domains2
Minimum domain size1
Maximum domain size459
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":1,"count":1},{"size":459,"count":91}]
Minimum variable degree3
Maximum variable degree6
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":3,"count":35},{"degree":4,"count":25},{"degree":5,"count":30},{"degree":6,"count":2}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity29
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":138},{"arity":14,"count":1},{"arity":23,"count":1},{"arity":24,"count":1},{"arity":29,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints138
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":138},{"type":"cumulative","count":4}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin VAR

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4312674OPT66 4.4945 4.49514
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-08-14 (complete)4310351OPT66 5.36302 2.31975
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4312211OPT66 5.38353 2.28684
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4301924OPT66 9.7306 3.83206
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4302725OPT66 13.0295 5.64366
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4302375OPT66 14.4381 5.95383
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4310001SAT (TO)66 252.051 245.428
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4301926? (NS) 0.058607 0.059758
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4301925? (TO) 260.15 88.9471

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 66
Solution found:
<instantiation type="optimum" cost="66"> <list> s[0] s[1] s[2] s[3] s[4] s[5] s[6] s[7] s[8] s[9] s[10] s[11] s[12] s[13] s[14] s[15] s[16]
s[17] s[18] s[19] s[20] s[21] s[22] s[23] s[24] s[25] s[26] s[27] s[28] s[29] s[30] s[31] s[32] s[33] s[34] s[35] s[36] s[37] s[38] s[39]
s[40] s[41] s[42] s[43] s[44] s[45] s[46] s[47] s[48] s[49] s[50] s[51] s[52] s[53] s[54] s[55] s[56] s[57] s[58] s[59] s[60] s[61] s[62]
s[63] s[64] s[65] s[66] s[67] s[68] s[69] s[70] s[71] s[72] s[73] s[74] s[75] s[76] s[77] s[78] s[79] s[80] s[81] s[82] s[83] s[84] s[85]
s[86] s[87] s[88] s[89] s[90] s[91] </list> <values> 0 0 0 0 6 6 6 9 8 6 9 18 9 8 2 45 8 11 16 13 19 13 21 22 32 2 20 26 18 18 20 16 32 43
21 28 21 32 30 2 20 23 19 33 21 12 40 27 38 41 20 40 19 32 10 34 40 28 34 12 43 46 32 55 31 49 44 32 44 33 50 40 40 49 46 43 21 52 50 62 43
52 51 52 53 53 58 28 56 55 65 66 </values> </instantiation>