2018 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
Rcpsp/
Rcpsp-j60-01-03_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameRcpsp/
Rcpsp-j60-01-03_c18.xml
MD5SUM0a05dcabfe37de5e4866d51519fc1f6c
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark68
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.76401
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables62
Number of constraints97
Number of domains2
Minimum domain size1
Maximum domain size316
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":1,"count":1},{"size":316,"count":61}]
Minimum variable degree3
Maximum variable degree6
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":3,"count":23},{"degree":4,"count":19},{"degree":5,"count":18},{"degree":6,"count":2}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity18
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":93},{"arity":12,"count":1},{"arity":14,"count":1},{"arity":16,"count":1},{"arity":18,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints93
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":93},{"type":"cumulative","count":4}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin VAR

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4312672OPT68 0.546511 0.551291
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4301918OPT68 1.76401 0.768021
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4312207OPT68 2.90986 1.5147
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-08-14 (complete)4310347OPT68 3.49753 2.06502
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4302371OPT68 8.90707 4.12446
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4302721OPT68 9.50078 4.26412
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4309997SAT (TO)68 252.103 246.617
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4301919SAT (TO)309 252.165 170.373
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4301920? (NS) 0.040444 0.0415281

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 68
Solution found:
<instantiation type="optimum" cost="68"> <list> s[0] s[1] s[2] s[3] s[4] s[5] s[6] s[7] s[8] s[9] s[10] s[11] s[12] s[13] s[14] s[15] s[16]
s[17] s[18] s[19] s[20] s[21] s[22] s[23] s[24] s[25] s[26] s[27] s[28] s[29] s[30] s[31] s[32] s[33] s[34] s[35] s[36] s[37] s[38] s[39]
s[40] s[41] s[42] s[43] s[44] s[45] s[46] s[47] s[48] s[49] s[50] s[51] s[52] s[53] s[54] s[55] s[56] s[57] s[58] s[59] s[60] s[61] </list>
<values> 0 0 0 0 14 31 6 16 6 12 7 15 15 48 16 14 7 12 16 25 19 19 19 30 28 15 1 6 19 31 33 40 19 38 25 22 16 25 32 22 35 31 38 46 31 28 44
56 32 48 39 49 33 54 37 43 51 53 59 62 63 68 </values> </instantiation>