2018 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
Rcpsp/
Rcpsp-j60-01-01_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameRcpsp/
Rcpsp-j60-01-01_c18.xml
MD5SUM03892ae4f8c09e3dcf1eb144c7e7557f
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark77
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.72916
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables62
Number of constraints97
Number of domains2
Minimum domain size1
Maximum domain size329
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":1,"count":1},{"size":329,"count":61}]
Minimum variable degree3
Maximum variable degree5
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":3,"count":22},{"degree":4,"count":19},{"degree":5,"count":21}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity16
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":93},{"arity":14,"count":2},{"arity":16,"count":2}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints93
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":93},{"type":"cumulative","count":4}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin VAR

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4312666OPT77 0.665584 0.666696
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4301900OPT77 1.72916 0.754862
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4312205OPT77 3.04187 1.54341
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-08-14 (complete)4310345OPT77 3.83703 2.31001
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4302369OPT77 8.62864 4.09792
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4302719OPT77 9.37225 5.44367
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4309995SAT (TO)77 252.095 246.929
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4301902? (NS) 0.040767 0.0417921
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4301901? (TO) 257.141 163.451

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 77
Solution found:
<instantiation type="optimum" cost="77"> <list> s[0] s[1] s[2] s[3] s[4] s[5] s[6] s[7] s[8] s[9] s[10] s[11] s[12] s[13] s[14] s[15] s[16]
s[17] s[18] s[19] s[20] s[21] s[22] s[23] s[24] s[25] s[26] s[27] s[28] s[29] s[30] s[31] s[32] s[33] s[34] s[35] s[36] s[37] s[38] s[39]
s[40] s[41] s[42] s[43] s[44] s[45] s[46] s[47] s[48] s[49] s[50] s[51] s[52] s[53] s[54] s[55] s[56] s[57] s[58] s[59] s[60] s[61] </list>
<values> 0 12 0 0 20 26 52 10 19 20 29 10 20 1 46 10 31 26 3 20 19 29 60 26 51 40 29 36 1 58 46 35 40 3 20 29 39 38 46 58 9 38 50 37 29 20
45 46 46 40 63 52 67 54 58 68 68 63 74 67 76 77 </values> </instantiation>