2018 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
GolombRuler/
GolombRuler-a3v18-09_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameGolombRuler/
GolombRuler-a3v18-09_c18.xml
MD5SUM967738086e80168f9eb4b0337d9e8cf6
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark44
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.83173
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables90
Number of constraints37
Number of domains2
Minimum domain size81
Maximum domain size82
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":81,"count":36},{"size":82,"count":9}]
Minimum variable degree0
Maximum variable degree9
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":0,"count":45},{"degree":2,"count":36},{"degree":8,"count":8},{"degree":9,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity3
Maximum constraint arity36
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":3,"count":36},{"arity":36,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints36
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":36},{"type":"allDifferent","count":1}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin VAR

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4312649OPT44 1.65724 1.65839
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4301851OPT44 1.83173 1.83344
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-08-14 (complete)4310326OPT44 4.24892 2.26646
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4312186OPT44 4.5675 2.72114
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4302350OPT44 17.9377 11.232
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4302700OPT44 19.1224 11.5154
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4301849OPT44 71.5452 67.8662
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4309976SAT (TO)44 252.082 247.127
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4301850SAT (TO)44 252.108 247.918

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 44
Solution found:
<instantiation type="optimum" cost="44"> <list> x[0] x[1] x[2] x[3] x[4] x[5] x[6] x[7] x[8] y[0][0] y[0][1] y[0][2] y[0][3] y[0][4] y[0][5]
y[0][6] y[0][7] y[0][8] y[1][0] y[1][1] y[1][2] y[1][3] y[1][4] y[1][5] y[1][6] y[1][7] y[1][8] y[2][0] y[2][1] y[2][2] y[2][3] y[2][4]
y[2][5] y[2][6] y[2][7] y[2][8] y[3][0] y[3][1] y[3][2] y[3][3] y[3][4] y[3][5] y[3][6] y[3][7] y[3][8] y[4][0] y[4][1] y[4][2] y[4][3]
y[4][4] y[4][5] y[4][6] y[4][7] y[4][8] y[5][0] y[5][1] y[5][2] y[5][3] y[5][4] y[5][5] y[5][6] y[5][7] y[5][8] y[6][0] y[6][1] y[6][2]
y[6][3] y[6][4] y[6][5] y[6][6] y[6][7] y[6][8] y[7][0] y[7][1] y[7][2] y[7][3] y[7][4] y[7][5] y[7][6] y[7][7] y[7][8] y[8][0] y[8][1]
y[8][2] y[8][3] y[8][4] y[8][5] y[8][6] y[8][7] y[8][8] </list> <values> 0 1 5 12 25 27 35 41 44 * 1 5 12 25 27 35 41 44 * * 4 11 24 26 34
40 43 * * * 7 20 22 30 36 39 * * * * 13 15 23 29 32 * * * * * 2 10 16 19 * * * * * * 8 14 17 * * * * * * * 6 9 * * * * * * * * 3 * * * * * *
* * * </values> </instantiation>