2018 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
GolombRuler/
GolombRuler-a3v18-nodv-09_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameGolombRuler/
GolombRuler-a3v18-nodv-09_c18.xml
MD5SUM5099229ea21e0b755c9ada14ed0c0ccc
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark44
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark11.6408
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables90
Number of constraints37
Number of domains2
Minimum domain size81
Maximum domain size82
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":81,"count":36},{"size":82,"count":9}]
Minimum variable degree0
Maximum variable degree9
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":0,"count":45},{"degree":2,"count":36},{"degree":8,"count":8},{"degree":9,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity3
Maximum constraint arity36
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":3,"count":36},{"arity":36,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints36
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":36},{"type":"allDifferent","count":1}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin VAR

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4312647OPT44 1.67407 1.67554
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4301845OPT44 11.6408 11.6482
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4301843OPT44 69.9165 66.4823
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4302358OPT44 110.868 102.43
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4302708OPT44 209.951 199.46
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4309984SAT44 249.879 247.879
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4312194SAT44 250.434 247.367
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4301844SAT (TO)44 252.185 247.818
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-08-14 (complete)4310334SAT (TO)47 252.033 245.437

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 44
Solution found:
<instantiation type="optimum" cost="44"> <list> x[0] x[1] x[2] x[3] x[4] x[5] x[6] x[7] x[8] y[0][0] y[0][1] y[0][2] y[0][3] y[0][4] y[0][5]
y[0][6] y[0][7] y[0][8] y[1][0] y[1][1] y[1][2] y[1][3] y[1][4] y[1][5] y[1][6] y[1][7] y[1][8] y[2][0] y[2][1] y[2][2] y[2][3] y[2][4]
y[2][5] y[2][6] y[2][7] y[2][8] y[3][0] y[3][1] y[3][2] y[3][3] y[3][4] y[3][5] y[3][6] y[3][7] y[3][8] y[4][0] y[4][1] y[4][2] y[4][3]
y[4][4] y[4][5] y[4][6] y[4][7] y[4][8] y[5][0] y[5][1] y[5][2] y[5][3] y[5][4] y[5][5] y[5][6] y[5][7] y[5][8] y[6][0] y[6][1] y[6][2]
y[6][3] y[6][4] y[6][5] y[6][6] y[6][7] y[6][8] y[7][0] y[7][1] y[7][2] y[7][3] y[7][4] y[7][5] y[7][6] y[7][7] y[7][8] y[8][0] y[8][1]
y[8][2] y[8][3] y[8][4] y[8][5] y[8][6] y[8][7] y[8][8] </list> <values> 0 1 5 12 25 27 35 41 44 * 1 5 12 25 27 35 41 44 * * 4 11 24 26 34
40 43 * * * 7 20 22 30 36 39 * * * * 13 15 23 29 32 * * * * * 2 10 16 19 * * * * * * 8 14 17 * * * * * * * 6 9 * * * * * * * * 3 * * * * * *
* * * </values> </instantiation>