2018 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
GolombRuler/
GolombRuler-a3v18-08_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameGolombRuler/
GolombRuler-a3v18-08_c18.xml
MD5SUM5c5040f535ec624befc4f337dc6f1e70
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark34
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.294383
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables72
Number of constraints29
Number of domains2
Minimum domain size64
Maximum domain size65
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":64,"count":28},{"size":65,"count":8}]
Minimum variable degree0
Maximum variable degree8
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":0,"count":36},{"degree":2,"count":28},{"degree":7,"count":7},{"degree":8,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity3
Maximum constraint arity28
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":3,"count":28},{"arity":28,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints28
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":28},{"type":"allDifferent","count":1}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin VAR

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4312645OPT34 0.17157 0.172355
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4301839OPT34 0.294383 0.295449
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-08-14 (complete)4310325OPT34 2.3122 1.28575
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4312185OPT34 2.70836 1.43857
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4301837OPT34 8.66983 4.71255
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4302349OPT34 9.46553 4.6982
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4302699OPT34 10.4095 5.15103
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4301838OPT34 58.3453 55.6661
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4309975SAT34 251.726 247.366

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 34
Solution found:
<instantiation type="optimum" cost="34"> <list> x[0] x[1] x[2] x[3] x[4] x[5] x[6] x[7] y[0][0] y[0][1] y[0][2] y[0][3] y[0][4] y[0][5]
y[0][6] y[0][7] y[1][0] y[1][1] y[1][2] y[1][3] y[1][4] y[1][5] y[1][6] y[1][7] y[2][0] y[2][1] y[2][2] y[2][3] y[2][4] y[2][5] y[2][6]
y[2][7] y[3][0] y[3][1] y[3][2] y[3][3] y[3][4] y[3][5] y[3][6] y[3][7] y[4][0] y[4][1] y[4][2] y[4][3] y[4][4] y[4][5] y[4][6] y[4][7]
y[5][0] y[5][1] y[5][2] y[5][3] y[5][4] y[5][5] y[5][6] y[5][7] y[6][0] y[6][1] y[6][2] y[6][3] y[6][4] y[6][5] y[6][6] y[6][7] y[7][0]
y[7][1] y[7][2] y[7][3] y[7][4] y[7][5] y[7][6] y[7][7] </list> <values> 0 2 12 19 25 30 33 34 * 2 12 19 25 30 33 34 * * 10 17 23 28 31 32 *
* * 7 13 18 21 22 * * * * 6 11 14 15 * * * * * 5 8 9 * * * * * * 3 4 * * * * * * * 1 * * * * * * * * </values> </instantiation>