2018 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
GolombRuler/
GolombRuler-a3v18-07_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameGolombRuler/
GolombRuler-a3v18-07_c18.xml
MD5SUMe42a0bd121bf3364b1a4e345eaac980a
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark25
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.040631
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables56
Number of constraints22
Number of domains2
Minimum domain size49
Maximum domain size50
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":49,"count":21},{"size":50,"count":7}]
Minimum variable degree0
Maximum variable degree7
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":0,"count":28},{"degree":2,"count":21},{"degree":6,"count":6},{"degree":7,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity3
Maximum constraint arity21
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":3,"count":21},{"arity":21,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints21
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":21},{"type":"allDifferent","count":1}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin VAR

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4312642OPT25 0.02996 0.0306241
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4301830OPT25 0.040631 0.042841
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4312184OPT25 1.81429 1.14693
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-08-14 (complete)4310324OPT25 1.88911 1.15889
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4301828OPT25 2.69747 1.06108
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4302348OPT25 7.59712 3.67603
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4302698OPT25 7.75792 3.74253
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4301829OPT25 13.2064 10.6838
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4309974SAT25 251.63 247.37

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 25
Solution found:
<instantiation type="optimum" cost="25"> <list> x[0] x[1] x[2] x[3] x[4] x[5] x[6] y[0][0] y[0][1] y[0][2] y[0][3] y[0][4] y[0][5] y[0][6]
y[1][0] y[1][1] y[1][2] y[1][3] y[1][4] y[1][5] y[1][6] y[2][0] y[2][1] y[2][2] y[2][3] y[2][4] y[2][5] y[2][6] y[3][0] y[3][1] y[3][2]
y[3][3] y[3][4] y[3][5] y[3][6] y[4][0] y[4][1] y[4][2] y[4][3] y[4][4] y[4][5] y[4][6] y[5][0] y[5][1] y[5][2] y[5][3] y[5][4] y[5][5]
y[5][6] y[6][0] y[6][1] y[6][2] y[6][3] y[6][4] y[6][5] y[6][6] </list> <values> 0 1 7 11 20 23 25 * 1 7 11 20 23 25 * * 6 10 19 22 24 * * *
4 13 16 18 * * * * 9 12 14 * * * * * 3 5 * * * * * * 2 * * * * * * * </values> </instantiation>