2018 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
TemplateDesign/
TemplateDesign-m1-2_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameTemplateDesign/
TemplateDesign-m1-2_c18.xml
MD5SUM9023d532dd437e307a8c97402098327c
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.50447
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables60
Number of constraints46
Number of domains8
Minimum domain size2
Maximum domain size1210
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":2,"count":5},{"size":7,"count":25},{"size":275,"count":5},{"size":286,"count":5},{"size":550,"count":5},{"size":880,"count":5},{"size":1101,"count":5},{"size":1210,"count":5}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree7
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":45},{"degree":3,"count":10},{"degree":7,"count":5}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity5
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":10},{"arity":3,"count":25},{"arity":5,"count":11}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints35
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":35},{"type":"ordered","count":1},{"type":"sum","count":10}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin SUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4312635OPT2 0.018592 0.019501
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4301807OPT2 1.50447 0.678998
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4312304OPT2 1.69053 1.10172
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-08-14 (complete)4310444OPT2 1.79122 1.13144
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4302468OPT2 9.28777 4.26588
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4302818OPT2 9.62595 4.3568
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4310094SAT2 251.182 247.363
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4301809? (TO) 252.007 252.01
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4301808? (TO) 260.321 86.0666

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 2
Solution found:
<instantiation type="optimum" cost="2"> <list> d[0][0] d[0][1] d[0][2] d[0][3] d[0][4] d[1][0] d[1][1] d[1][2] d[1][3] d[1][4] d[2][0]
d[2][1] d[2][2] d[2][3] d[2][4] d[3][0] d[3][1] d[3][2] d[3][3] d[3][4] d[4][0] d[4][1] d[4][2] d[4][3] d[4][4] npt[0] npt[1] npt[2] npt[3]
npt[4] u[0] u[1] u[2] u[3] u[4] nptv[0][0] nptv[0][1] nptv[0][2] nptv[0][3] nptv[0][4] nptv[1][0] nptv[1][1] nptv[1][2] nptv[1][3]
nptv[1][4] nptv[2][0] nptv[2][1] nptv[2][2] nptv[2][3] nptv[2][4] nptv[3][0] nptv[3][1] nptv[3][2] nptv[3][3] nptv[3][4] nptv[4][0]
nptv[4][1] nptv[4][2] nptv[4][3] nptv[4][4] </list> <values> 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 5 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 260 240 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 260
260 520 520 0 0 0 0 240 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 </values> </instantiation>