2018 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
TemplateDesign/
TemplateDesign-m1s-catfood_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameTemplateDesign/
TemplateDesign-m1s-catfood_c18.xml
MD5SUM03d7e3da755da5305422e48d51916754
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.55122
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables112
Number of constraints70
Number of domains9
Minimum domain size2
Maximum domain size1210
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":2,"count":7},{"size":10,"count":49},{"size":275,"count":7},{"size":280,"count":7},{"size":286,"count":7},{"size":550,"count":14},{"size":880,"count":7},{"size":1101,"count":7},{"size":1210,"count":7}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree8
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":105},{"degree":8,"count":7}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity7
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":7},{"arity":3,"count":49},{"arity":7,"count":14}]
Number of extensional constraints7
Number of intensional constraints49
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"extension","count":7},{"type":"intension","count":49},{"type":"sum","count":14}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin SUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4312631OPT2 0.046853 0.0475991
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4301795OPT2 1.55122 0.878038
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4312310OPT2 2.34572 1.31543
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-08-14 (complete)4310450OPT2 2.427 1.69809
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4302474OPT2 10.4148 4.5155
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4302824OPT2 11.5912 4.85914
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4310100SAT2 251.891 247.376
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4301797? (TO) 252.039 252.01
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4301796? (TO) 260.082 87.4411

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 2
Solution found:
<instantiation type="optimum" cost="2"> <list> d[0][0] d[0][1] d[0][2] d[0][3] d[0][4] d[0][5] d[0][6] d[1][0] d[1][1] d[1][2] d[1][3]
d[1][4] d[1][5] d[1][6] d[2][0] d[2][1] d[2][2] d[2][3] d[2][4] d[2][5] d[2][6] d[3][0] d[3][1] d[3][2] d[3][3] d[3][4] d[3][5] d[3][6]
d[4][0] d[4][1] d[4][2] d[4][3] d[4][4] d[4][5] d[4][6] d[5][0] d[5][1] d[5][2] d[5][3] d[5][4] d[5][5] d[5][6] d[6][0] d[6][1] d[6][2]
d[6][3] d[6][4] d[6][5] d[6][6] npt[0] npt[1] npt[2] npt[3] npt[4] npt[5] npt[6] u[0] u[1] u[2] u[3] u[4] u[5] u[6] nptv[0][0] nptv[0][1]
nptv[0][2] nptv[0][3] nptv[0][4] nptv[0][5] nptv[0][6] nptv[1][0] nptv[1][1] nptv[1][2] nptv[1][3] nptv[1][4] nptv[1][5] nptv[1][6]
nptv[2][0] nptv[2][1] nptv[2][2] nptv[2][3] nptv[2][4] nptv[2][5] nptv[2][6] nptv[3][0] nptv[3][1] nptv[3][2] nptv[3][3] nptv[3][4]
nptv[3][5] nptv[3][6] nptv[4][0] nptv[4][1] nptv[4][2] nptv[4][3] nptv[4][4] nptv[4][5] nptv[4][6] nptv[5][0] nptv[5][1] nptv[5][2]
nptv[5][3] nptv[5][4] nptv[5][5] nptv[5][6] nptv[6][0] nptv[6][1] nptv[6][2] nptv[6][3] nptv[6][4] nptv[6][5] nptv[6][6] </list> <values> 0
0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 247 150 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 247 247 247 494 494 494 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 1050 </values> </instantiation>