2018 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
TemplateDesign/
TemplateDesign-m2-catfood_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameTemplateDesign/
TemplateDesign-m2-catfood_c18.xml
MD5SUM27271f0787f1d872c0f25c4abe418056
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.36772
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables63
Number of constraints29
Number of domains3
Minimum domain size2
Maximum domain size1101
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":2,"count":7},{"size":10,"count":49},{"size":1101,"count":7}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree9
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":42},{"degree":3,"count":14},{"degree":9,"count":7}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity14
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":14},{"arity":7,"count":8},{"arity":14,"count":7}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints14
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":14},{"type":"ordered","count":1},{"type":"sum","count":14}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin SUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4312628OPT2 0.013902 0.014647
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4301786OPT2 1.36772 0.626227
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-08-14 (complete)4310455OPT2 6.62543 4.43323
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4302829OPT2 11.7116 5.05917
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4302479OPT2 14.4452 7.01945
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4312315OPT2 15.9621 13.995
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4310105SAT (TO)2 252.104 246.319
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4301788? (TO) 252.009 252.01
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4301787? (TO) 259.914 88.442

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 2
Solution found:
<instantiation type="optimum" cost="2"> <list> d[0][0] d[0][1] d[0][2] d[0][3] d[0][4] d[0][5] d[0][6] d[1][0] d[1][1] d[1][2] d[1][3]
d[1][4] d[1][5] d[1][6] d[2][0] d[2][1] d[2][2] d[2][3] d[2][4] d[2][5] d[2][6] d[3][0] d[3][1] d[3][2] d[3][3] d[3][4] d[3][5] d[3][6]
d[4][0] d[4][1] d[4][2] d[4][3] d[4][4] d[4][5] d[4][6] d[5][0] d[5][1] d[5][2] d[5][3] d[5][4] d[5][5] d[5][6] d[6][0] d[6][1] d[6][2]
d[6][3] d[6][4] d[6][5] d[6][6] npt[0] npt[1] npt[2] npt[3] npt[4] npt[5] npt[6] u[0] u[1] u[2] u[3] u[4] u[5] u[6] </list> <values> 1 1 1 2
2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 247 150 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 </values>
</instantiation>