2018 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
PizzaVoucher/
PizzaVoucher-10b_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NamePizzaVoucher/
PizzaVoucher-10b_c18.xml
MD5SUM2b2c64c71c05a1ba529c691595973c48
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark28
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark9.32603
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables38
Number of constraints79
Number of domains14
Minimum domain size1
Maximum domain size19
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":1,"count":2},{"size":2,"count":21},{"size":3,"count":3},{"size":4,"count":2},{"size":19,"count":10}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree28
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":28},{"degree":27,"count":6},{"degree":28,"count":4}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity11
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":61},{"arity":11,"count":18}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints61
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":61},{"type":"count","count":18}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin SUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4301751OPT28 9.32603 7.49076
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4312616OPT28 19.7312 19.7307
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4302378OPT28 56.1736 46.9443
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4302728OPT28 113.029 102.119
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4301750OPT28 243.298 239.994
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4301752SAT (TO)28 252.006 252.01
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4312214SAT (TO)28 252.042 245.415
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4310004SAT (TO)28 252.076 246.718
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-08-14 (complete)4310354SAT (TO)28 252.101 244.416

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 28
Solution found:
<instantiation type="optimum" cost="28"> <list> v[0] v[1] v[2] v[3] v[4] v[5] v[6] v[7] v[8] v[9] np[0] np[1] np[2] np[3] np[4] np[5] np[6]
np[7] np[8] nf[0] nf[1] nf[2] nf[3] nf[4] nf[5] nf[6] nf[7] nf[8] pp[0] pp[1] pp[2] pp[3] pp[4] pp[5] pp[6] pp[7] pp[8] pp[9] </list>
<values> 2 2 1 -2 1 -1 0 2 -2 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 10 4 0 7 0 </values> </instantiation>