2018 XCSP3 competition: fast COP track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
GraphColoring/
GraphColoring-5-fullins-3_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameGraphColoring/
GraphColoring-5-fullins-3_c18.xml
MD5SUMeef3a44daff87ab56f58eeeb8cf69225
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkOPT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark7
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.358061
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables154
Number of constraints792
Number of domains1
Minimum domain size154
Maximum domain size154
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":154,"count":154}]
Minimum variable degree5
Maximum variable degree28
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":5,"count":4},{"degree":6,"count":22},{"degree":7,"count":12},{"degree":8,"count":60},{"degree":11,"count":7},{"degree":17,"count":7},{"degree":18,"count":35},{"degree":28,"count":7}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity2
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":792}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints792
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":792}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin MAXIMUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4301383OPT7 0.358061 0.360444
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4312497OPT7 0.498831 0.500222
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4301381OPT7 6.03878 2.61565
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4302288OPT7 17.2807 7.63126
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4312124OPT7 17.9404 15.3822
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4302638OPT7 18.3278 8.17004
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4309914SAT (TO)7 252.031 246.428
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-08-14 (complete)4310264SAT (TO)7 252.034 242.038
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4301382SAT (TO)126 252.094 223.239

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 7
Solution found:
<instantiation type='solution' cost='7'> <list>x[0] x[100] x[101] x[102] x[103] x[104] x[105] x[106] x[107] x[108] x[109] x[10] x[110]
x[111] x[112] x[113] x[114] x[115] x[116] x[117] x[118] x[119] x[11] x[120] x[121] x[122] x[123] x[124] x[125] x[126] x[127] x[128] x[129]
x[12] x[130] x[131] x[132] x[133] x[134] x[135] x[136] x[137] x[138] x[139] x[13] x[140] x[141] x[142] x[143] x[144] x[145] x[146] x[147]
x[148] x[149] x[14] x[150] x[151] x[152] x[153] x[15] x[16] x[17] x[18] x[19] x[1] x[20] x[21] x[22] x[23] x[24] x[25] x[26] x[27] x[28]
x[29] x[2] x[30] x[31] x[32] x[33] x[34] x[35] x[36] x[37] x[38] x[39] x[3] x[40] x[41] x[42] x[43] x[44] x[45] x[46] x[47] x[48] x[49] x[4]
x[50] x[51] x[52] x[53] x[54] x[55] x[56] x[57] x[58] x[59] x[5] x[60] x[61] x[62] x[63] x[64] x[65] x[66] x[67] x[68] x[69] x[6] x[70]
x[71] x[72] x[73] x[74] x[75] x[76] x[77] x[78] x[79] x[7] x[80] x[81] x[82] x[83] x[84] x[85] x[86] x[87] x[88] x[89] x[8] x[90] x[91]
x[92] x[93] x[94] x[95] x[96] x[97] x[98] x[99] x[9] </list> <values>0 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 2 1 0 5 4 3 0 2 1 4 5 6 1 7 0 1 0 1 3 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 1 3 3 1 3 3 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 </values> </instantiation>