2018 XCSP3 competition: sequential solvers tracks: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
Langford/
LangfordBin-16_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameLangford/
LangfordBin-16_c18.xml
MD5SUM27c67f30ca0ef1b1bbbeaa4cb2c2f178
Bench CategoryCSP (decision problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.261181
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables64
Number of constraints48
Number of domains2
Minimum domain size16
Maximum domain size32
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":16,"count":32},{"size":32,"count":32}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree32
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":32},{"degree":32,"count":32}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity33
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":16},{"arity":33,"count":32}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints16
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":16},{"type":"element","count":32}]
Optimization problemNO
Type of objective

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
PicatSAT 2018-08-02 (complete)4303271SAT 0.261181 0.261566
PicatSAT 2018-06-15 (complete)4294238SAT 0.26179 0.261839
PicatSAT 2018-08-14 (complete)4309611SAT 0.305607 0.317755
Choco-solver 4.0.7 seq (493a269) (complete)4292501SAT 1.23353 0.592041
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4306795SAT 1.24257 0.597639
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4308089SAT 1.63148 1.06605
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4311825SAT 1.64898 1.08329
OscaR - Conflict Ordering 2018-08-14 (complete)4307590SAT 1.79895 1.10977
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-07-02 (complete)4290545SAT 1.83283 1.1781
OscaR - Conflict Ordering 2018-07-02 (complete)4290769SAT 1.99484 1.2749
scop both+MapleCOMSPS (2018-06-13) (complete)4294239SAT 4.32813 2.01507
scop order+MapleCOMSPS (2018-06-13) (complete)4294240SAT 4.48698 2.04266
scop order+MapleCOMSPS (2018-07-31) (complete)4305352SAT 5.44178 2.87244
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4290058SAT 5.45944 3.55517
scop both+MapleCOMSPS (2018-07-31) (complete)4305588SAT 5.61641 2.77633
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4303857SAT 9.86933 9.86963
Mistral-2.0 2018-06-15 (complete)4289448SAT 409.963 409.981
BTD_12 2018-06-11_12 (complete)4294232? 2520.01 2519.97
BTD 2018.06.11_3 (complete)4294233? 2520.01 2519.94
macht 2018.06.11 (complete)4294237? (TO) 2519.91 2520.01
BTD 2018.07.27_3 (complete)4306296? (TO) 2519.97 2520.01
macht 2018.07.27 (complete)4305824? (TO) 2519.98 2520.01
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4294236? (TO) 2520 2520.01
BTD_12 2018.07.27_12 (complete)4306060? (TO) 2520.01 2520.01
Concrete 3.8-SuperNG 2018-06-13 (complete)4294235? (TO) 2520.05 2481.43
Concrete 3.8 2018-06-13 (complete)4294234? (TO) 2520.08 2477.33
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4304987? (TO) 2520.1 2476.83
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4304988? (TO) 2520.13 2479.43

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function:
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list> v[] p[]  </list> <values> 4 13 6 12 15 4 7 11 3 6 14 9 3 16 7 13 12 5 10 11 15 9 8 5 2 14 1 2 1 10 16 8  28 26 27 24
12 8 5 0 23 17 9 2 14 6 31 22 21 11 29 18 19 7 16 3 15 1 25 10 20 4 30 13   </values> </instantiation>