2018 XCSP3 competition: sequential solvers tracks: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
Langford/
LangfordBin-15_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameLangford/
LangfordBin-15_c18.xml
MD5SUM07ea5144b09b59ff4e6e73933349a8c8
Bench CategoryCSP (decision problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.017778
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables60
Number of constraints45
Number of domains2
Minimum domain size15
Maximum domain size30
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":15,"count":30},{"size":30,"count":30}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree30
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":30},{"degree":30,"count":30}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity31
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":15},{"arity":31,"count":30}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints15
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":15},{"type":"element","count":30}]
Optimization problemNO
Type of objective

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4294200SAT 0.017778 0.019812
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4303856SAT 0.088254 0.088371
Mistral-2.0 2018-06-15 (complete)4289444SAT 0.401901 0.406911
PicatSAT 2018-08-14 (complete)4309610SAT 1.25907 1.26356
PicatSAT 2018-08-02 (complete)4303270SAT 1.26172 1.26199
PicatSAT 2018-06-15 (complete)4294202SAT 1.26797 1.26816
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4311824SAT 1.63877 1.08559
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4308088SAT 1.64351 1.09689
OscaR - Conflict Ordering 2018-08-14 (complete)4307589SAT 1.72923 1.09638
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-07-02 (complete)4290544SAT 1.79389 1.14842
OscaR - Conflict Ordering 2018-07-02 (complete)4290768SAT 1.91872 1.19699
scop order+MapleCOMSPS (2018-06-13) (complete)4294204SAT 4.02509 1.87081
scop both+MapleCOMSPS (2018-06-13) (complete)4294203SAT 4.11426 1.87781
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4290057SAT 5.26383 3.54151
scop both+MapleCOMSPS (2018-07-31) (complete)4305587SAT 5.27325 2.73714
scop order+MapleCOMSPS (2018-07-31) (complete)4305351SAT 5.42155 2.71633
BTD 2018.06.11_3 (complete)4294197? 2520.01 2519.94
BTD_12 2018.07.27_12 (complete)4306059? 2520.01 2519.94
BTD_12 2018-06-11_12 (complete)4294196? 2520.01 2519.96
Choco-solver 4.0.7 seq (493a269) (complete)4292500? (TO) 2400.08 2377.91
BTD 2018.07.27_3 (complete)4306295? (TO) 2519.74 2520.01
macht 2018.06.11 (complete)4294201? (TO) 2519.93 2520.01
macht 2018.07.27 (complete)4305823? (TO) 2520.01 2520.01
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4304980? (TO) 2520.05 2479.14
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4306794? (TO) 2520.05 2497.81
Concrete 3.8-SuperNG 2018-06-13 (complete)4294199? (TO) 2520.11 2483.23
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4304979? (TO) 2520.12 2476.73
Concrete 3.8 2018-06-13 (complete)4294198? (TO) 2520.13 2478.63

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function:
Solution found:
<instantiation type='solution'> <list>v[0] v[1] v[2] v[3] v[4] v[5] v[6] v[7] v[8] v[9] v[10] v[11] v[12] v[13] v[14] v[15] v[16] v[17]
v[18] v[19] v[20] v[21] v[22] v[23] v[24] v[25] v[26] v[27] v[28] v[29] p[0] p[1] p[2] p[3] p[4] p[5] p[6] p[7] p[8] p[9] p[10] p[11] p[12]
p[13] p[14] p[15] p[16] p[17] p[18] p[19] p[20] p[21] p[22] p[23] p[24] p[25] p[26] p[27] p[28] p[29] </list> <values>15 12 14 11 8 6 3 13 9
10 3 7 6 8 12 11 15 14 9 7 10 13 5 2 4 1 2 1 5 4 27 25 26 23 10 6 29 24 28 22 12 5 19 11 13 4 18 8 20 9 15 3 14 1 21 7 17 2 16 0 </values>
</instantiation>