2018 XCSP3 competition: sequential solvers tracks: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
Bibd/
Bibd-sum-12-06-05_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameBibd/
Bibd-sum-12-06-05_c18.xml
MD5SUMbf61c3b78160d4d4d295899ad65dbbc2
Bench CategoryCSP (decision problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.22958
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables264
Number of constraints101
Number of domains1
Minimum domain size2
Maximum domain size2
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":2,"count":264}]
Minimum variable degree14
Maximum variable degree14
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":14,"count":264}]
Minimum constraint arity12
Maximum constraint arity264
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":12,"count":22},{"arity":22,"count":12},{"arity":44,"count":66},{"arity":264,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints0
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"lex","count":1},{"type":"sum","count":100}]
Optimization problemNO
Type of objective

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
PicatSAT 2018-08-14 (complete)4309569SAT 1.22958 1.22976
Mistral-2.0 2018-06-15 (complete)4289440SAT 1.76933 1.77069
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4303815SAT 1.87239 1.87803
PicatSAT 2018-06-15 (complete)4294166SAT 2.77098 2.77113
PicatSAT 2018-08-02 (complete)4303229SAT 2.79742 2.80222
scop order+MapleCOMSPS (2018-06-13) (complete)4294168SAT 13.7697 5.87788
scop both+MapleCOMSPS (2018-06-13) (complete)4294167SAT 13.8623 5.84961
scop both+MapleCOMSPS (2018-07-31) (complete)4305546SAT 13.9711 5.93895
scop order+MapleCOMSPS (2018-07-31) (complete)4305310SAT 14.0781 5.89617
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4290016SAT 73.4246 71.0144
Choco-solver 4.0.7 seq (493a269) (complete)4292459SAT 1280.81 1276.15
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4306753SAT 1306.34 1302.19
BTD_12 2018-06-11_12 (complete)4294160? (NS) 0.06695 0.0672271
BTD 2018.06.11_3 (complete)4294161? (NS) 0.067096 0.0672891
macht 2018.06.11 (complete)4294165? (NS) 0.067203 0.067396
macht 2018.07.27 (complete)4305782? (NS) 0.067454 0.0677841
BTD 2018.07.27_3 (complete)4306254? (NS) 0.06758 0.0678671
BTD_12 2018.07.27_12 (complete)4306018? (NS) 0.067998 0.0682571
OscaR - Conflict Ordering 2018-07-02 (complete)4290727? (TO) 2400.08 2356.61
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-07-02 (complete)4290503? (TO) 2400.08 2358.71
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4311783? (TO) 2520.03 2477.51
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4304971? (TO) 2520.06 2461.83
Concrete 3.8-SuperNG 2018-06-13 (complete)4294163? (TO) 2520.07 2458.34
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4308047? (TO) 2520.08 2477.51
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4294164? (TO) 2520.1 2519.8
OscaR - Conflict Ordering 2018-08-14 (complete)4307548? (TO) 2520.11 2474.71
Concrete 3.8 2018-06-13 (complete)4294162? (TO) 2520.13 2463.23
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4304972? (TO) 2520.16 2459.04

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function:
Solution found:
<instantiation> <list> x[][]  </list> <values> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1
1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1
0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0
0 0 1 1 0 1 0   </values> </instantiation>