2018 XCSP3 competition: sequential solvers tracks: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
Rlfap/Rlfap-opt/
Rlfap-scen-08-opt_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NameRlfap/Rlfap-opt/
Rlfap-scen-08-opt_c18.xml
MD5SUM9be5bd0a86f9e024d7fdf548556c4b89
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark1997
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark2519.99
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables6202
Number of constraints5744
Number of domains11
Minimum domain size2
Maximum domain size44
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":2,"count":5286},{"size":6,"count":6},{"size":22,"count":36},{"size":24,"count":8},{"size":36,"count":360},{"size":42,"count":22},{"size":44,"count":484}]
Minimum variable degree1
Maximum variable degree62
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":1,"count":12},{"degree":2,"count":5287},{"degree":3,"count":38},{"degree":4,"count":17},{"degree":5,"count":102},{"degree":6,"count":22},{"degree":7,"count":111},{"degree":8,"count":16},{"degree":9,"count":111},{"degree":10,"count":35},{"degree":11,"count":48},{"degree":12,"count":33},{"degree":13,"count":52},{"degree":14,"count":19},{"degree":15,"count":61},{"degree":16,"count":14},{"degree":17,"count":33},{"degree":18,"count":10},{"degree":19,"count":26},{"degree":20,"count":19},{"degree":21,"count":18},{"degree":22,"count":8},{"degree":23,"count":15},{"degree":24,"count":11},{"degree":25,"count":13},{"degree":26,"count":1},{"degree":27,"count":14},{"degree":28,"count":12},{"degree":29,"count":6},{"degree":30,"count":10},{"degree":31,"count":2},{"degree":32,"count":2},{"degree":34,"count":3},{"degree":35,"count":4},{"degree":36,"count":4},{"degree":37,"count":1},{"degree":38,"count":2},{"degree":39,"count":4},{"degree":42,"count":1},{"degree":43,"count":1},{"degree":44,"count":1},{"degree":47,"count":1},{"degree":55,"count":1},{"degree":62,"count":1}]
Minimum constraint arity2
Maximum constraint arity3
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":2,"count":458},{"arity":3,"count":5286}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints5744
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"intension","count":5744}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin SUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4293554SAT (TO)1997 2519.99 2520.01
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4304307SAT (TO)2087 2520.12 2375.86
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4304308SAT (TO)2257 2520.59 1974.28
Choco-solver 4.0.7 seq (493a269) (complete)4292711SAT (TO)2273 2400.12 2385.13
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4307005SAT (TO)2273 2520.07 2506.12
Concrete 3.8-SuperNG 2018-06-13 (complete)4293553SAT (TO)2280 2520.82 1588.04
Concrete 3.8 2018-06-13 (complete)4293552SAT (TO)2458 2520.16 2420.25
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4291858SAT (TO)2538 2400.22 2380.64
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4304067SAT (TO)4433 2519.83 2520.01
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-08-14 (complete)4308661SAT (TO)4722 2520.1 2470.66
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-07-02 (complete)4291861SAT (TO)4903 2400.15 2344.65
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-07-02 (complete)4291859? (TO) 2400.12 2376.62
PicatSAT 2018-08-02 (complete)4303481? (TO) 2519.8 2520.01
PicatSAT 2018-06-15 (complete)4293555? (TO) 2519.96 2520.01
PicatSAT 2018-08-14 (complete)4309821? (TO) 2520.02 2520.02
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4308299? (TO) 2520.07 2497.42
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4312035? (TO) 2520.11 2494.82
Mistral-2.0 2018-06-15 (complete)4291857Signal 0.299961 1.81909

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 1997
Solution found:
--too large--