2018 XCSP3 competition: sequential solvers tracks: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
PseudoBoolean-opt/
Pb-radar-30-70-45-050-100_c18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

NamePseudoBoolean-opt/
Pb-radar-30-70-45-050-100_c18.xml
MD5SUM23165fcfff40784a2bf31a56a137e510
Bench CategoryCOP (optimization problem)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark158
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark2400.15
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables10772
Number of constraints12051
Number of domains1
Minimum domain size2
Maximum domain size2
Distribution of domain sizes[{"size":2,"count":10772}]
Minimum variable degree2
Maximum variable degree8
Distribution of variable degrees[{"degree":2,"count":11},{"degree":3,"count":276},{"degree":4,"count":2592},{"degree":5,"count":2714},{"degree":6,"count":4775},{"degree":7,"count":8},{"degree":8,"count":396}]
Minimum constraint arity1
Maximum constraint arity31
Distribution of constraint arities[{"arity":1,"count":1},{"arity":2,"count":10198},{"arity":3,"count":51},{"arity":4,"count":82},{"arity":5,"count":78},{"arity":6,"count":82},{"arity":7,"count":76},{"arity":8,"count":83},{"arity":9,"count":58},{"arity":10,"count":61},{"arity":11,"count":69},{"arity":12,"count":86},{"arity":13,"count":92},{"arity":14,"count":114},{"arity":15,"count":121},{"arity":16,"count":124},{"arity":17,"count":119},{"arity":18,"count":133},{"arity":19,"count":96},{"arity":20,"count":100},{"arity":21,"count":81},{"arity":22,"count":45},{"arity":23,"count":37},{"arity":24,"count":21},{"arity":25,"count":17},{"arity":26,"count":7},{"arity":27,"count":13},{"arity":28,"count":2},{"arity":29,"count":2},{"arity":30,"count":1},{"arity":31,"count":1}]
Number of extensional constraints0
Number of intensional constraints0
Distribution of constraint types[{"type":"sum","count":12051}]
Optimization problemYES
Type of objectivemin SUM

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j-CSP 2018-07-11 (complete)4289886SAT (TO)158 2400.15 2387.18
Choco-solver 4.0.7 seq (493a269) (complete)4292329SAT (TO)422 2400.05 2391.53
Choco-solver 4.0.7b seq (e747e1e) (complete)4306623SAT (TO)422 2520.05 2511.62
Mistral-2.0 2018-06-15 (complete)4289320SAT (TO)445 2400.05 2399.9
Mistral-2.0 2018-08-01 (complete)4303685SAT (TO)445 2519.77 2520.01
cosoco 1.12 (complete)4293087SAT (TO)491 2519.98 2520.02
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-17 (complete)4311653SAT (TO)3008 2520.1 2474.13
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-07-02 (complete)4290373SAT (TO)3013 2400.08 2349.04
OscaR - Conflict Ordering with restarts 2018-08-14 (complete)4307917SAT (TO)3095 2520.11 2480.43
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-07-02 (complete)4291571? (TO) 2408.09 893.378
PicatSAT 2018-08-02 (complete)4303099? (TO) 2519.96 2520.02
PicatSAT 2018-08-14 (complete)4309439? (TO) 2520.05 2520.02
PicatSAT 2018-06-15 (complete)4293088? (TO) 2520.12 2520.02
Concrete 3.9.2 (complete)4304231? (TO) 2527.98 697.479
OscaR - Hybrid 2018-08-14 (complete)4308503? (TO) 2528.15 958.469
Concrete 3.9.2-SuperNG (complete)4304232? (TO) 2528.28 681.974
Concrete 3.8-SuperNG 2018-06-13 (complete)4293086? (TO) 2528.3 704.667
Concrete 3.8 2018-06-13 (complete)4293085? (TO) 2528.37 713.756

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 158
Solution found:
--too large--