SAT 2011 Competition: main competition (phase 2): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Bench CategoryRANDOM (random instances)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark6.88795
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables75
Number of clauses1597
Sum of the clauses size7985
Maximum clause length5
Minimum clause length5
Number of clauses of size 10
Number of clauses of size 20
Number of clauses of size 30
Number of clauses of size 40
Number of clauses of size 51597
Number of clauses of size over 50

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
march_rw 2011-03-02 (complete)3420829UNSAT 6.88795 6.88869
SAT09 reference solver: march_hi hi (complete)3211729UNSAT 7.16291 7.16342
borg-sat 11.03.02-random [DEPRECATED] (complete)3322303UNSAT 47.3788 7.91717
MPhaseSAT_M 2011-02-16 (complete)3222386UNSAT 50.3094 50.3087
borg-sat 11.03.02-par-random (fixed) (complete)3385816UNSAT 55.2176 7.54117
ppfolio par (complete)3222387UNSAT 55.3896 6.93638
borg-sat 11.03.02-seq-random (fixed) (complete)3387016UNSAT 107.595 107.58
SAT09 reference solver: SATzilla2009_R 2009-03-22 (complete)3211730UNSAT 120.665 120.667
Satisfiability Solver Selector 2011-03-18 (complete)3222384UNSAT 169.15 171.51
ppfolio seq (complete)3222388UNSAT 290.168 290.165
sparrow2011 sparrow2011_ubcsat1.2_2011-03-02 (incomplete)3222385? (TO) 5000.02 4999.91
adaptg2wsat2011 2011-03-02 (incomplete)3446493? (TO) 5000.06 4999.91
EagleUP 1.565.350 (incomplete)3222389? (TO) 5000.06 4999.91
sattime2011 2011-03-02 (incomplete)3427109? (TO) 5000.06 4999.92
SAT09 reference solver: gnovelty+2 2009-03-22 (incomplete)3211728? (TO) 5000.09 4999.91
SAT09 reference solver: TNM 2009-03-22 (incomplete)3211731? (TO) 5000.1 5000.01
csls pnorm-8cores (incomplete)3418234? (TO) 40000.6 5008.72

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: