SAT 2011 Competition: main competition (phase 2): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Bench CategoryRANDOM (random instances)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark7.40687
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables75
Number of clauses1597
Sum of the clauses size7985
Maximum clause length5
Minimum clause length5
Number of clauses of size 10
Number of clauses of size 20
Number of clauses of size 30
Number of clauses of size 40
Number of clauses of size 51597
Number of clauses of size over 50

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
march_rw 2011-03-02 (complete)3420654UNSAT 7.40687 7.40782
SAT09 reference solver: march_hi hi (complete)3211029UNSAT 7.70583 7.70601
MPhaseSAT_M 2011-02-16 (complete)3221336UNSAT 54.2108 54.217
ppfolio par (complete)3221337UNSAT 59.08 7.41316
borg-sat 11.03.02-random [DEPRECATED] (complete)3322128UNSAT 60.3488 10.0872
borg-sat 11.03.02-par-random (fixed) (complete)3385641UNSAT 73.4328 10.0261
borg-sat 11.03.02-seq-random (fixed) (complete)3386841UNSAT 107.665 107.563
SAT09 reference solver: SATzilla2009_R 2009-03-22 (complete)3211030UNSAT 134.957 134.962
Satisfiability Solver Selector 2011-03-18 (complete)3221334UNSAT 168.83 168.943
ppfolio seq (complete)3221338UNSAT 185.858 185.854
sattime2011 2011-03-02 (incomplete)3426934? (TO) 5000.04 4999.92
SAT09 reference solver: TNM 2009-03-22 (incomplete)3211031? (TO) 5000.05 4999.91
sparrow2011 sparrow2011_ubcsat1.2_2011-03-02 (incomplete)3221335? (TO) 5000.05 4999.91
SAT09 reference solver: gnovelty+2 2009-03-22 (incomplete)3211028? (TO) 5000.08 5000.01
adaptg2wsat2011 2011-03-02 (incomplete)3446318? (TO) 5000.1 5000.02
EagleUP 1.565.350 (incomplete)3221339? (TO) 5000.1 4999.91
csls pnorm-8cores (incomplete)3418059? (TO) 40000.5 5009.44

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: