SAT 2011 Competition: main competition (phase 2): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Bench CategoryRANDOM (random instances)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark8.50571
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables75
Number of clauses1597
Sum of the clauses size7985
Maximum clause length5
Minimum clause length5
Number of clauses of size 10
Number of clauses of size 20
Number of clauses of size 30
Number of clauses of size 40
Number of clauses of size 51597
Number of clauses of size over 50

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
march_rw 2011-03-02 (complete)3420630UNSAT 8.50571 8.50548
SAT09 reference solver: march_hi hi (complete)3210933UNSAT 8.85065 8.85077
MPhaseSAT_M 2011-02-16 (complete)3221192UNSAT 51.6072 51.6067
borg-sat 11.03.02-random [DEPRECATED] (complete)3322104UNSAT 60.4518 11.5999
borg-sat 11.03.02-par-random (fixed) (complete)3385617UNSAT 61.7516 11.8709
ppfolio par (complete)3221193UNSAT 67.86 8.53552
borg-sat 11.03.02-seq-random (fixed) (complete)3386817UNSAT 109.822 109.588
SAT09 reference solver: SATzilla2009_R 2009-03-22 (complete)3210934UNSAT 151.251 151.252
Satisfiability Solver Selector 2011-03-18 (complete)3221190UNSAT 171.53 171.667
ppfolio seq (complete)3221194UNSAT 313.94 313.943
SAT09 reference solver: TNM 2009-03-22 (incomplete)3210935? (TO) 4999.18 5000.01
SAT09 reference solver: gnovelty+2 2009-03-22 (incomplete)3210932? (TO) 5000.03 4999.91
adaptg2wsat2011 2011-03-02 (incomplete)3446294? (TO) 5000.04 4999.92
sparrow2011 sparrow2011_ubcsat1.2_2011-03-02 (incomplete)3221191? (TO) 5000.08 5000.01
sattime2011 2011-03-02 (incomplete)3426910? (TO) 5000.1 5000.02
EagleUP 1.565.350 (incomplete)3221195? (TO) 5000.1 5000.01
csls pnorm-8cores (incomplete)3418035? (TO) 40000.7 5009.93

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: