SAT 2011 Competition: main competition (phase 2): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Bench CategoryRANDOM (random instances)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark7.9028
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables75
Number of clauses1597
Sum of the clauses size7985
Maximum clause length5
Minimum clause length5
Number of clauses of size 10
Number of clauses of size 20
Number of clauses of size 30
Number of clauses of size 40
Number of clauses of size 51597
Number of clauses of size over 50

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
march_rw 2011-03-02 (complete)3420577UNSAT 7.9028 7.90331
SAT09 reference solver: march_hi hi (complete)3210721UNSAT 8.29774 8.30051
MPhaseSAT_M 2011-02-16 (complete)3220874UNSAT 51.1702 51.1711
borg-sat 11.03.02-par-random (fixed) (complete)3385564UNSAT 56.2704 8.85273
ppfolio par (complete)3220875UNSAT 63.5313 7.95668
borg-sat 11.03.02-random [DEPRECATED] (complete)3322051UNSAT 71.3731 10.8098
borg-sat 11.03.02-seq-random (fixed) (complete)3386764UNSAT 108.286 108.158
SAT09 reference solver: SATzilla2009_R 2009-03-22 (complete)3210722UNSAT 143.945 143.948
Satisfiability Solver Selector 2011-03-18 (complete)3220872UNSAT 169.33 169.492
ppfolio seq (complete)3220876UNSAT 319.261 319.269
SAT09 reference solver: gnovelty+2 2009-03-22 (incomplete)3210720? (TO) 5000.02 4999.91
EagleUP 1.565.350 (incomplete)3220877? (TO) 5000.03 4999.91
sparrow2011 sparrow2011_ubcsat1.2_2011-03-02 (incomplete)3220873? (TO) 5000.06 4999.91
adaptg2wsat2011 2011-03-02 (incomplete)3446241? (TO) 5000.09 4999.92
SAT09 reference solver: TNM 2009-03-22 (incomplete)3210723? (TO) 5000.1 4999.91
sattime2011 2011-03-02 (incomplete)3426857? (TO) 5000.11 5000.12
csls pnorm-8cores (incomplete)3417982? (TO) 40001 5009.54

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: