SAT 2011 Competition: main competition (phase 2): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Bench CategoryRANDOM (random instances)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark823.532
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables500
Number of clauses2130
Sum of the clauses size6390
Maximum clause length3
Minimum clause length3
Number of clauses of size 10
Number of clauses of size 20
Number of clauses of size 32130
Number of clauses of size 40
Number of clauses of size 50
Number of clauses of size over 50

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
march_rw 2011-03-02 (complete)3420561UNSAT 823.532 823.508
SAT09 reference solver: march_hi hi (complete)3210657UNSAT 905.031 905.014
SAT09 reference solver: SATzilla2009_R 2009-03-22 (complete)3210658UNSAT 1339.77 1339.73
borg-sat 11.03.02-seq-random (fixed) (complete)3386748UNSAT 3687.42 3675.45
borg-sat 11.03.02-par-random (fixed) (complete)3385548UNSAT 5619.32 979.45
borg-sat 11.03.02-random [DEPRECATED] (complete)3322035UNSAT 5866.43 838.059
ppfolio par (complete)3220779UNSAT 6721.55 840.774
csls pnorm-8cores (incomplete)3417966? (problem) 22272.7 3427.37
sparrow2011 sparrow2011_ubcsat1.2_2011-03-02 (incomplete)3220777? (TO) 5000.02 4999.91
Satisfiability Solver Selector 2011-03-18 (complete)3220776? (TO) 5000.04 4999.92
SAT09 reference solver: gnovelty+2 2009-03-22 (incomplete)3210656? (TO) 5000.05 4999.91
SAT09 reference solver: TNM 2009-03-22 (incomplete)3210659? (TO) 5000.05 4999.91
ppfolio seq (complete)3220780? (TO) 5000.05 4999.91
sattime2011 2011-03-02 (incomplete)3426841? (TO) 5000.07 4999.92
adaptg2wsat2011 2011-03-02 (incomplete)3446225? (TO) 5000.07 5000.02
MPhaseSAT_M 2011-02-16 (complete)3220778? (TO) 5000.08 4999.92
EagleUP 1.565.350 (incomplete)3220781? (TO) 5000.09 4999.91

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: