SAT 2011 Competition: main competition (phase 2): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Bench CategoryRANDOM (random instances)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.255961
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables250
Number of clauses1065
Sum of the clauses size3195
Maximum clause length3
Minimum clause length3
Number of clauses of size 10
Number of clauses of size 20
Number of clauses of size 31065
Number of clauses of size 40
Number of clauses of size 50
Number of clauses of size over 50

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
march_rw 2011-03-02 (complete)3420521UNSAT 0.255961 0.256129
SAT09 reference solver: march_hi hi (complete)3210497UNSAT 0.279956 0.27982
ppfolio par (complete)3220539UNSAT 0.788879 0.269125
borg-sat 11.03.02-par-random (fixed) (complete)3385508UNSAT 2.75958 0.941716
borg-sat 11.03.02-random [DEPRECATED] (complete)3321995UNSAT 3.15552 1.07389
ppfolio seq (complete)3220540UNSAT 6.86696 6.8687
Satisfiability Solver Selector 2011-03-18 (complete)3220536UNSAT 7.83 8.45192
SAT09 reference solver: SATzilla2009_R 2009-03-22 (complete)3210498UNSAT 32.873 32.8737
MPhaseSAT_M 2011-02-16 (complete)3220538UNSAT 53.2179 53.2179
borg-sat 11.03.02-seq-random (fixed) (complete)3386708UNSAT 101.448 101.179
csls pnorm-8cores (incomplete)3417926? (problem) 20434.1 2917.92
SAT09 reference solver: gnovelty+2 2009-03-22 (incomplete)3210496? (TO) 5000.02 4999.91
adaptg2wsat2011 2011-03-02 (incomplete)3446185? (TO) 5000.04 4999.93
sparrow2011 sparrow2011_ubcsat1.2_2011-03-02 (incomplete)3220537? (TO) 5000.1 5000.01
SAT09 reference solver: TNM 2009-03-22 (incomplete)3210499? (TO) 5000.1 4999.91
EagleUP 1.565.350 (incomplete)3220541? (TO) 5000.1 4999.91
sattime2011 2011-03-02 (incomplete)3426801? (TO) 5000.12 5000.11

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: