SAT 2011 Competition: main competition (phase 2): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Bench CategoryRANDOM (random instances)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark6.08107
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables75
Number of clauses1597
Sum of the clauses size7985
Maximum clause length5
Minimum clause length5
Number of clauses of size 10
Number of clauses of size 20
Number of clauses of size 30
Number of clauses of size 40
Number of clauses of size 51597
Number of clauses of size over 50

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
march_rw 2011-03-02 (complete)3420510UNSAT 6.08107 6.08156
SAT09 reference solver: march_hi hi (complete)3210453UNSAT 6.37403 6.3786
ppfolio par (complete)3220473UNSAT 48.63 6.12379
MPhaseSAT_M 2011-02-16 (complete)3220472UNSAT 49.2495 49.2487
borg-sat 11.03.02-random [DEPRECATED] (complete)3321984UNSAT 58.4181 8.98401
borg-sat 11.03.02-par-random (fixed) (complete)3385497UNSAT 58.6761 9.00062
borg-sat 11.03.02-seq-random (fixed) (complete)3386697UNSAT 106.381 106.096
SAT09 reference solver: SATzilla2009_R 2009-03-22 (complete)3210454UNSAT 116.419 116.429
Satisfiability Solver Selector 2011-03-18 (complete)3220470UNSAT 167.54 167.671
ppfolio seq (complete)3220474UNSAT 235.036 235.031
SAT09 reference solver: TNM 2009-03-22 (incomplete)3210455? (TO) 5000.01 5000.01
EagleUP 1.565.350 (incomplete)3220475? (TO) 5000.02 4999.91
adaptg2wsat2011 2011-03-02 (incomplete)3446174? (TO) 5000.03 4999.92
SAT09 reference solver: gnovelty+2 2009-03-22 (incomplete)3210452? (TO) 5000.05 4999.91
sparrow2011 sparrow2011_ubcsat1.2_2011-03-02 (incomplete)3220471? (TO) 5000.05 4999.91
sattime2011 2011-03-02 (incomplete)3426790? (TO) 5000.06 4999.92
csls pnorm-8cores (incomplete)3417915? (TO) 40000.4 5009.22

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: