SAT 2011 Competition: main competition (phase 2): solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Bench CategoryRANDOM (random instances)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark108.505
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40000
Number of clauses168000
Sum of the clauses size504000
Maximum clause length3
Minimum clause length3
Number of clauses of size 10
Number of clauses of size 20
Number of clauses of size 3168000
Number of clauses of size 40
Number of clauses of size 50
Number of clauses of size over 50

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
sparrow2011 sparrow2011_ubcsat1.2_2011-03-02 (incomplete)3219547SAT 108.505 108.508
adaptg2wsat2011 2011-03-02 (incomplete)3446020SAT 1049.46 1049.43
csls pnorm-8cores (incomplete)3417761SAT 1509.17 188.998
borg-sat 11.03.02-seq-random (fixed) (complete)3386543SAT 1640.17 1635.95
ppfolio seq (complete)3219550SAT 3422.92 3422.81
sattime2011 2011-03-02 (incomplete)3426636SAT 3802.59 3802.54
SAT09 reference solver: SATzilla2009_R 2009-03-22 (complete)3209838? (exit code) 4999.04 4998.92
borg-sat 11.03.02-par-random (fixed) (complete)3385343? (MO) 7175.13 908.72
borg-sat 11.03.02-random [DEPRECATED] (complete)3321830? (MO) 7734.48 978.006
Satisfiability Solver Selector 2011-03-18 (complete)3219546? (TO) 5000.02 5000.02
SAT09 reference solver: gnovelty+2 2009-03-22 (incomplete)3209836? (TO) 5000.04 4999.91
EagleUP 1.565.350 (incomplete)3219551? (TO) 5000.05 4999.91
march_rw 2011-03-02 (complete)3420356? (TO) 5000.07 4999.92
MPhaseSAT_M 2011-02-16 (complete)3219548? (TO) 5000.08 4999.92
SAT09 reference solver: TNM 2009-03-22 (incomplete)3209839? (TO) 5000.09 5000.01
SAT09 reference solver: march_hi hi (complete)3209837? (TO) 5000.09 5000.01
ppfolio par (complete)3219549? (TO) 39970.4 5000.02

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
--too large--