PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/SOFT-BIGINT-LIN/PB10/oliveras/j60/
normalized-j6033_2-unsat--soft-0-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/SOFT-BIGINT-LIN/PB10/oliveras/j60/
normalized-j6033_2-unsat--soft-0-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM760a13c53343c1a6f431e5ddf8292a4c
Bench CategorySOFT-BIGINT-LIN (only soft constraints, big integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark20
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark2.19267
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables12200
Total number of constraints42056
Number of soft constraints42056
Number of constraints which are clauses41660
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)0
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints396
Minimum length of a constraint1
Maximum length of a constraint18
Top cost 2126290
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 2126289
Biggest number in a constraint 13
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 4
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 116
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers7
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4090836OPTIMUM 2.19267 1.09245
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4093608OPTIMUM 3.87041 3.87336
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4092222OPTIMUM 4.41333 2.35378
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4094994MSAT 110.143 110.161

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 20
Solution found:
--too large--