PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900552735--soft-33-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900552735--soft-33-100-0.wbo
MD5SUMd8302a34385139d2b71dca1f77dee50d
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark4
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark40.9408
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints1802
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 91108
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 91107
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 739
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109996OPTIMUM 26.539 25.3054
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109999OPTIMUM 40.9408 40.9468
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109997OPTIMUM 50.3773 44.8962
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109998OPTIMUM 92.271 92.2825

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 4
Solution found:
-x1 x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158
-x159 -x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181
-x182 -x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204
-x205 -x206 -x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227 -x228
-x229 -x230 -x231