PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900568706--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900568706--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM0424fd5691d718147f8291be7b6f72f2
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark7
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark18.6502
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints892
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 45060
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 45059
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 711
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109971OPTIMUM 18.6502 18.6537
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109968OPTIMUM 25.67 24.0442
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109969OPTIMUM 34.6987 36.3393
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109970OPTIMUM 38.5371 38.5453

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 7
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 x88 x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 x131 x132 -x133 -x134 -x135 -x136
-x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158 x159
-x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181 -x182
-x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204 -x205
-x206 -x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 x225 -x226 -x227 -x228
-x229 -x230 -x231