PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900546076--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900546076--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM0b9d6337ad7964b2b0f1686d5d01e741
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark13
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark35.5746
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints900
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 45741
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 45740
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 723
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109895OPTIMUM 35.5746 35.5798
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109892OPTIMUM 38.5971 36.8763
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109893OPTIMUM 53.1359 52.1338
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109894OPTIMUM 82.8764 82.8898

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 13
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
x31 -x32 -x33 x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158
-x159 -x160 x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181 -x182
-x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204 -x205
-x206 -x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227 -x228
-x229 -x230 -x231