PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900554420--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900554420--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUMb79c8ce52bbf55b2415ca4df8d18f0c8
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark14.5578
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints906
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 44555
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 44554
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 689
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109863OPTIMUM 14.5578 14.5615
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109860OPTIMUM 14.88 13.7049
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109862OPTIMUM 21.0298 21.0447
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109861OPTIMUM 41.2387 38.4474

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 x57 -x58 -x59
-x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86 -x87
-x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158
-x159 -x160 x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181 x182
-x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204 -x205
x206 -x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227 -x228
-x229 x230 -x231