PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900576927--soft-33-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900576927--soft-33-100-0.wbo
MD5SUMb0bcd9e760e7f0ffa9653d41066a148b
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark39.9479
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints1785
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 88246
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 88245
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 671
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4094739OPTIMUM 39.9479 39.9542
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4091967OPTIMUM 49.9874 47.9727
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4090581OPTIMUM 90.54 88.572
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4093353OPTIMUM 255.792 255.832

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 x19 -x20 -x21 x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158
-x159 -x160 x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181 x182
-x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204 -x205
-x206 -x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227 -x228
-x229 -x230 x231