PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900558739--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900558739--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM099eb4454f9d71550aca948671f10d54
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark55.9645
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints900
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 45741
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 45740
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 649
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109788OPTIMUM 52.359 50.6457
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109791OPTIMUM 55.9645 55.9726
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109789OPTIMUM 86.8318 56.8683
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109790OPTIMUM 243.814 243.876

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 2
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 x55 -x56 -x57 x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 x156 -x157 -x158
-x159 -x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181
-x182 -x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204
-x205 -x206 -x207 -x208 x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 x225 -x226 -x227 -x228
-x229 -x230 -x231