PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900568186--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900568186--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM105b60f6fd410ca15d025f7b690efafc
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark13
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark43.3174
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints927
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 45360
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 45359
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 721
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109776OPTIMUM 17.2614 15.2974
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109779OPTIMUM 43.3174 43.3248
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109777OPTIMUM 49.4465 37.7504
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109778OPTIMUM 91.4331 91.4492

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 13
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 x99 -x100 -x101 x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 x156 -x157 -x158
-x159 -x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181
-x182 -x183 -x184 x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 x203 -x204 -x205
-x206 -x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227 -x228
-x229 -x230 x231