PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900574864--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900574864--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM8675827de7240d8277488879d51bec75
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark17.8323
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints925
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 46664
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 46663
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 671
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109680OPTIMUM 16.3315 14.6394
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109683OPTIMUM 17.8323 17.8355
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109681OPTIMUM 24.5113 26.641
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109682OPTIMUM 38.2252 38.231

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 x33 -x34 -x35 x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 x151 -x152 -x153 x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158
-x159 -x160 -x161 -x162 x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 x179 -x180 -x181
-x182 -x183 -x184 -x185 x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204
-x205 -x206 -x207 x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 x227 -x228
-x229 -x230 -x231