PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1110970444--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1110970444--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUMcabbc57a5ab962c45538fe46c723245f
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark80
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark19.919
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables169
Total number of constraints101
Number of soft constraints28
Number of constraints which are clauses30
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)70
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint169
Top cost 1415
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 98
Sum of constraints costs 1414
Biggest number in a constraint 38
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 6
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 1239
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers11
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4090594OPTIMUM 11.1213 9.60078
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4094752OPTIMUM 19.919 19.9242
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4091980OPTIMUM 20.4619 35.3857
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4093366OPTIMUM 49.5435 49.5506

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 80
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 x156 -x157 -x158
-x159 -x160 x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169