PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1111221624--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1111221624--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM973bd9f90df82f06bcaac12e428be840
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark22
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark7.2199
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables169
Total number of constraints101
Number of soft constraints42
Number of constraints which are clauses30
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)70
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint169
Top cost 1838
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 97
Sum of constraints costs 1837
Biggest number in a constraint 38
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 6
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 1248
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers11
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109419OPTIMUM 7.2199 7.2222
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109416OPTIMUM 7.57385 6.90824
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109417OPTIMUM 19.661 24.8296
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109418OPTIMUM 19.668 19.6755

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 22
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 x134 -x135 -x136
-x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158 -x159
-x160 -x161 -x162 x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169