PB'16 competition: satisfaction and optimization track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Bench CategoryOPT-BIGINT (optimisation, big integers)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best value of the objective obtained on this benchmark52428797515
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1800.68
Has Objective FunctionYES
(Un)Satisfiability was provedYES
Best value of the objective function 52428797515
Optimality of the best value was proved NO
Number of variables240
Total number of constraints14
Number of constraints which are clauses0
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)1
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints13
Minimum length of a constraint90
Maximum length of a constraint239
Number of terms in the objective function 240
Biggest coefficient in the objective function 1934281311383406679529881600000
Number of bits for the biggest coefficient in the objective function 101
Sum of the numbers in the objective function 3868562622766813359059763201675
Number of bits of the sum of numbers in the objective function 102
Biggest number in a constraint 1208925819614629174706176000000000
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 110
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 2417851639229258350773194212202779
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers111
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerobjective functionCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4103882SAT (TO)52428797515 1800.68 899.54
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4103881? (MO) 264.359 264.431
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4103884? (TO) 1800.02 1795.64
minisatp 2012-10-02 git-d91742b (complete)4113741? (TO) 1800.03 1800.3
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4103883? (TO) 1800.05 1800.4

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

objective function: 52428797515
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 x39 x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 x48 -x49 -x50 x51 -x52 -x53 x54 -x55 x56 -x57 x58 x59 x60
x61 x62 x63 x64 x65 x66 x67 x68 x69 x70 x71 x72 x73 x74 x75 x76 x77 x78 x79 x80 x81 x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86 -x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92
-x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112 -x113 -x114 -x115 -x116
-x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135 -x136 -x137 -x138 -x139
-x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 x150 -x151 x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 x157 -x158 -x159 -x160 -x161 -x162 -x163
-x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 x179 -x180 -x181 -x182 -x183 -x184 -x185 -x186
-x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204 -x205 -x206 -x207 -x208 -x209
-x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227 x228 x229 -x230 -x231 -x232 -x233
-x234 x235 -x236 -x237 -x238 -x239 -x240