MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
maxcsp/pi/pi-20-10-20-t60/
normalized-pi-20-10-20-40-94.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namemaxcsp/pi/pi-20-10-20-t60/
normalized-pi-20-10-20-40-94.xml
MD5SUM0c4f3f98bd03038c09de9d2a35531618
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.053991
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables20
Number of constraints53
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension53
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
toulbar2 2008-06-271125134OPTIMUM1 0.053991 0.059865
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271125133OPTIMUM1 0.099984 0.106086
Sugar v1.13+minisat1125132OPTIMUM1 1.46778 1.72167
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1125131OPTIMUM1 1.52377 1.79382
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1125129OPTIMUM1 31.6982 33.8776
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1125130OPTIMUM1 31.8292 34.2716
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301125128MSAT (TO)1 3600.01 3617.82
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301125127MSAT (TO)1 3600.05 3634.02

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
8 2 9 2 8 4 1 10 1 7 8 4 4 1 4 5 6 4 7 4