MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
maxcsp/pi/pi-20-10-20-t60/
normalized-pi-20-10-20-40-17.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namemaxcsp/pi/pi-20-10-20-t60/
normalized-pi-20-10-20-40-17.xml
MD5SUM87f89f58c34410ec2b2d6688cde7f380
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.043992
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables20
Number of constraints53
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension53
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
toulbar2 2008-06-271124910OPTIMUM2 0.043992 0.0514359
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271124909OPTIMUM2 0.075987 0.07743
Sugar v1.13+minisat1124908OPTIMUM2 1.25481 1.51212
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1124907OPTIMUM2 1.26181 1.4619
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1124906OPTIMUM2 56.2904 95.772
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1124905OPTIMUM2 85.407 171.418
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301124904MSAT (TO)2 3600.03 3615.32
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301124903MSAT (TO)2 3600.08 3603.02

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 2
Solution found:
9 3 6 9 5 8 6 4 6 1 7 1 1 4 2 2 1 8 9 5