MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.8/
normalized-rand-2-40-80-103-800-64_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.8/
normalized-rand-2-40-80-103-800-64_ext.xml
MD5SUMf9c8bda5fc3b0c3beda53b7b7900eaf2
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark730.668
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints103
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size80
Number of constraints which are defined in extension103
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271115253OPTIMUM1 326.797 328.178
toulbar2 2008-06-271115254OPTIMUM1 730.668 731.637
Sugar v1.13+minisat1115252OPTIMUM1 975.746 977.968
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1115251OPTIMUM1 1059.78 1071.77
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301115248MSAT (TO)1 3600.02 3621.52
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301115247MSAT (TO)1 3600.1 3625.02
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1115249MSAT (TO)2 1786.84 4000.07
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1115250MSAT (TO)2 3307.25 4000.11

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
14 70 58 51 5 50 25 0 79 5 33 8 31 13 77 34 3 70 61 11 2 0 7 32 20 72 0 46 48 71 52 29 64 61 4 21 0 39 64 15